hmm didn't expect this to cover such a large area, hope I've not messed up the A1 relation...

These changes around the A199/A1 have been reverted as there no access restrictions here.

No ill will, just I've had the same thought and investigated it before :)

From a quick look around various junctions, the signage doesn't really allow you to decide on trunk/primary as they often disagree with each other.

There are white signs coming off the M9 to the A8 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5714577045249570 (on Street View you can see these were green signs in 2013) - but at the roundabout exit there is a green sign.

At the Barnton junction there is a green sign on the east side which would seem to indicate the A90/A902 is trunk https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=303705991384867 but that is contradicted by a white sign at Maybury which points to the same road: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=890379831691638

At Burnshot you have a white and green sign (the latter has now been replaced by white on Street View!) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=530446831695644

So in short - I don't think these should be trunk in OSM...

This note can be resolved? note/2428873

Just read your forum post.
What have you based the changes on, as in, which particular road signs? Because for this section of the A8 for example, there are white signs off the M9 and a green sign at Maybury junction.
The trunk tagging in OSM matches Transport Scotland's trunk, as there are inconsistencies with the green/white signs in various places.

Couldn't help but notice you had added a few bicycle_parking=anchors tags in various places. I saw one here - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=393846428407689 - normally tagged as "stands", is that what these anchors are?

Why did you delete the address node?

Hi Rob, where exactly are people wandering off onto the farm tracks - is it where the public footpath and track meets near this stile? node/780597320

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Perhaps it would be better changing things so that only motor_vehicle=private is tagged here? Assuming that it's only private to vehicles.

I wondered whether to do that or mark it as private... (in the end I did neither!)

This car dealership was tagged as closed a month ago node/4051543912/history - have you surveyed it since then?

Reverted. You must not use Google Maps to make changes to OpenStreetMap.

Is there a particular reason why you've added a building on top of all the other buildings?

Thanks for adding this - changed it to bridge:name, then I thought I should add a bridge area as well.

Perhaps it joins up with this track? way/1049727196

Perhaps motor_vehicle=private instead of access=?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've fixed the buildings to their correct sizes, and changed the McDonalds one into a node instead as there's no building on aerial imagery yet.

I'm not really sure what you're getting at - is the tagging wrong or something? Tidal range is about 4-5m, the gates are open unless a big boat with timber comes in, the sailing club now has pontoons (see Maxar).

Yes it's tidal (only occasionally the gates are closed) - it's already tagged as dock=tidal, does it need another tag?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Just watch out for connecting paths/roads to landuse/natural areas. :-)
Also, if you're not aware Strava's heatmap is available to use for adding paths - I use this url for a custom layer to see possible missing paths: https://proxy.nakarte.me/https/heatmap-external-b.strava.com/tiles-auth/all/hot/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png?px=256