GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 122220593 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for adding the grounds, fixed it so there is only one school object here though. |
| 122720448 | over 3 years ago | I've removed the address data from the building as it was already tagged on the address nodes :) |
| 122752640 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. I've extended the wall to block off this section and moved the path back a bit. |
| 122775001 | over 3 years ago | thanks but not quite right :) |
| 122176063 | over 3 years ago | This was raised with CycleStreets: https://twitter.com/OSMScotland/status/1535219713114005506 - basically your end point was geolocated to the private roads, whereas if the end point was the terminal it wouldn't have used the private roads! |
| 121776666 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Not cycled this way recently - wonder if you can help as it might be worth adding the "smoothness" value to this path? smoothness=* |
| 122470082 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit :) |
| 122195700 | over 3 years ago | Please check the co-ordinates and the wikipedia page before adding, as it actually refers to a building on the coast here: osm.org/?mlat=56.0315&mlon=-3.3492&zoom=15#map=18/56.03140/-3.34953 |
| 122176063 | over 3 years ago | That is surely a problem with CycleStreets rather than the tagging though, as the OSM website routers manage fine: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=55.9554%2C-3.3419%3B55.9481%2C-3.3603#map=15/55.9424/-3.3435 |
| 122176063 | over 3 years ago | Any particular reason why you added the bicycle restrictions? As it already has access=private |
| 121845408 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for adding this - though I've moved it to the south side of the A96 as per the article photo and linked it to the minor road as per https://www.bearscot.com/a96-lhanbryde-to-fochabers-footway-and-cycleway-project/ |
| 118561340 | over 3 years ago | Hi, highway=services is not the correct tag for this - node/9583459500 |
| 119430686 | over 3 years ago | Not sure why you changed this to crossing=toucan but I've fixed it. node/4976104204/history |
| 121778857 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for the reply - I just didn't know what had been deleted and couldn't see the history. :)
|
| 121778857 | over 3 years ago | Hi, what is the relation that you've deleted in this changeset? |
| 121497899 | over 3 years ago | Worth checking Strava's heatmap as it shows some heat on the trail, and you might want to connect the path to the two tracks :) |
| 121480301 | over 3 years ago | The arrows show the direction in which the road has been drawn, so when you add a one way tag it goes that way (you can reverse the direction if it's the wrong way). |
| 121480301 | over 3 years ago | Do you mean on the south side? If so it should be cycleway:right as the arrows (direction) on the way are pointing east. |
| 120316666 | over 3 years ago | removed these duplicates |
| 119892058 | over 3 years ago | node/3261581444 you've put this gate on the apex of a path but I'm assuming it is meant to be on one of the three paths off this connection? |