GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114195677 | about 4 years ago | Why did you remove the industrial tag? |
| 114185879 | about 4 years ago | These buildings seem out of alignment with existing OSM features, and don't seem to line up with any imagery or the cadastral parcels. Did you accidentally offset the Bing imagery or something before you started mapping? |
| 113982637 | about 4 years ago | Hi, just wondering what your source is for this edit?
|
| 113800469 | about 4 years ago | Hi, do you know how the path crosses this fence here? node/5912552636 |
| 113649138 | about 4 years ago | Do you not think it would be a good idea to add a shop=* tag to this? |
| 113615765 | about 4 years ago | If the burn is underground there surely there isn't a ford here? :) node/9241078533 |
| 113571785 | about 4 years ago | Hi, what routing problems are you referring to? |
| 112577956 | about 4 years ago | Hi, not sure why you replaced the houses already there with a single building, but I've mapped some more houses.
|
| 113039098 | about 4 years ago | Yeah I did, south of the coal reserve looks like a field now on Maxar. Easier to remove than try to make smaller, but I've forgot to re-add the grass/scrub! |
| 112713024 | about 4 years ago | Just wondering why you removed the access tags? |
| 107426328 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately that tag is pretty useless as it's a bit subjective and not clearly defined. It's also only used about 2,000 times instead of the much more popular tower+tower:type=communication. :) |
| 112533971 | about 4 years ago | Not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing data
|
| 111875731 | about 4 years ago | Was updating this area and noticed this road was set as removed - way/718464024 - however on the latest Maxar imagery there seems to be some sort of road/path there and this map shows it as a cycle path: https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/48142/a9-dualling-luncarty-to-pass-of-birnam-new-cycle-and-pedestrian-paths.pdf
|
| 112479064 | about 4 years ago | Hi, if there are two house numbers here you'd be better adding two nodes with the separate address details. |
| 107426328 | about 4 years ago | Why did you change node/4457628592/history to a man_made=communications_tower? |
| 112368378 | about 4 years ago | Is the ATM still there? |
| 111914512 | about 4 years ago | Hi, not sure why you moved these buildings? |
| 111463275 | about 4 years ago | Can you provide a link to where you got the coastline from? Seems to be slightly different to OS StreetView's blue MHWS.
|
| 111855374 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for adding this - however I don't think it needs an access tag as there's nothing restricting them to just customers? :) |
| 111743371 | about 4 years ago | Thanks, I've extended the path through the trees and adjusted the fences, hopefully that matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add any of the house numbers around here if you know them :) |