Is there really a building here?

Hi, if there's already a bridge on the road above (like at the River Dee crossing) then the roads below don't need to be tagged as a tunnel :)

I've changed these to asphalt as I'm assuming they were not meant to be tagged as unpaved! :)

Hi, does this path connect to the one on the other side of the trees, and how does it go through the fence?

Suppose my thinking is whether religion=* needs to be tagged at all on non-dom. schools. Since they are sort of in between a school which is actually non-religious and one which is religious (eg RC). Assuming that religion=none/no means no religion?
Have all the religious schools been tagged yet?

Hi, thanks for adding the building here. Unfortunately the Bing imagery here is out of alignment - please enable the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay and use it to align Bing before editing. Thanks :)

I'm wondering whether religion=none is the appropriate value for non-denominational schools, since technically they aren't non-religious...

Hi, are you able to link me to the planning document that you used for mapwarper?

Thanks for the reply (I've reverted it). In this case if you check the history of the way you can see someone changed it from construction to residential (as in, the road is now open) 12 months ago.
So I think you've wrongly assumed that the highway/construction tag mismatch means that the road is still under construction. In my experience it is usually the opposite - construction=residential with highway=residentially is normally because someone has forgotten to delete the construction tag! :)
Worth checking other imagery to confirm, as Esri shows cars parked at these houses and OS OpenMap shows it as open.

Assume this wasn't meant to be a building? way/961057797

Have you surveyed this?

Where did you get these U numbers from?

What does ref=3 mean on this bridge? way/418061440

There's four buildings around way/77199789 showing on aerial imagery but not on the map - have these been demolished?

Hi, I've removed the craft tag and name as there's already an area for the distillery way/406644353

Thanks, I'd spotted the school was missing a name from this page: https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/TD/ - might be worth having a look on there for others or those which are no longer open?

No, as that would be osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
What should happen is osm-carto needs to fix it so that ref is rendered instead of name, as per this issue: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3271

Any chance you could move these buildings back to where they were?
Unfortunately the Bing imagery is usually out of alignment - so you need to turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay to help fix the offset before editing.

Notice you've adjusted the junction at Drayton Court. Unfortunately the roads are now misaligned with existing OSM data, as the Bing imagery seems out of alignment here.
Please can you use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay to help fix the alignment with the imagery offset tool before editing. :)

If a road/path is under construction it's better to be tagged highway=construction rather than footway + access=no. Makes it clearer that it's not yet open, with a single tag. Also means that's if a data consumer misses the access tag they can't be mispresented as actual paths.