Hi, what routing problems are you referring to?

Hi, not sure why you replaced the houses already there with a single building, but I've mapped some more houses.
Feel free to some address nodes if you know the house numbers around here.

Yeah I did, south of the coal reserve looks like a field now on Maxar. Easier to remove than try to make smaller, but I've forgot to re-add the grass/scrub!

Just wondering why you removed the access tags?

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately that tag is pretty useless as it's a bit subjective and not clearly defined. It's also only used about 2,000 times instead of the much more popular tower+tower:type=communication. :)

Not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing data
- you should use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to help align Bing before editing.

Was updating this area and noticed this road was set as removed - way/718464024 - however on the latest Maxar imagery there seems to be some sort of road/path there and this map shows it as a cycle path: https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/48142/a9-dualling-luncarty-to-pass-of-birnam-new-cycle-and-pedestrian-paths.pdf
Do you the exact situation?

Hi, if there are two house numbers here you'd be better adding two nodes with the separate address details.

Why did you change node/4457628592/history to a man_made=communications_tower?

Is the ATM still there?

Hi, not sure why you moved these buildings?

Can you provide a link to where you got the coastline from? Seems to be slightly different to OS StreetView's blue MHWS.
Also, are you able to reconnect the various streams that used to connect to the coastline, e.g. node/282465190

Thanks for adding this - however I don't think it needs an access tag as there's nothing restricting them to just customers? :)

Thanks, I've extended the path through the trees and adjusted the fences, hopefully that matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add any of the house numbers around here if you know them :)

Is there really a building here?

Hi, if there's already a bridge on the road above (like at the River Dee crossing) then the roads below don't need to be tagged as a tunnel :)

I've changed these to asphalt as I'm assuming they were not meant to be tagged as unpaved! :)

Hi, does this path connect to the one on the other side of the trees, and how does it go through the fence?

Suppose my thinking is whether religion=* needs to be tagged at all on non-dom. schools. Since they are sort of in between a school which is actually non-religious and one which is religious (eg RC). Assuming that religion=none/no means no religion?
Have all the religious schools been tagged yet?

Hi, thanks for adding the building here. Unfortunately the Bing imagery here is out of alignment - please enable the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay and use it to align Bing before editing. Thanks :)