OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114195677 about 4 years ago

Why did you remove the industrial tag?

114185879 about 4 years ago

These buildings seem out of alignment with existing OSM features, and don't seem to line up with any imagery or the cadastral parcels. Did you accidentally offset the Bing imagery or something before you started mapping?

113982637 about 4 years ago

Hi, just wondering what your source is for this edit?
And presumably this bridge would also be non directional? way/954878631

113800469 about 4 years ago

Hi, do you know how the path crosses this fence here? node/5912552636

113649138 about 4 years ago

Do you not think it would be a good idea to add a shop=* tag to this?

113615765 about 4 years ago

If the burn is underground there surely there isn't a ford here? :) node/9241078533

113571785 about 4 years ago

Hi, what routing problems are you referring to?

112577956 about 4 years ago

Hi, not sure why you replaced the houses already there with a single building, but I've mapped some more houses.
Feel free to some address nodes if you know the house numbers around here.

113039098 about 4 years ago

Yeah I did, south of the coal reserve looks like a field now on Maxar. Easier to remove than try to make smaller, but I've forgot to re-add the grass/scrub!

112713024 about 4 years ago

Just wondering why you removed the access tags?

107426328 about 4 years ago

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately that tag is pretty useless as it's a bit subjective and not clearly defined. It's also only used about 2,000 times instead of the much more popular tower+tower:type=communication. :)

112533971 about 4 years ago

Not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing data
- you should use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to help align Bing before editing.

111875731 about 4 years ago

Was updating this area and noticed this road was set as removed - way/718464024 - however on the latest Maxar imagery there seems to be some sort of road/path there and this map shows it as a cycle path: https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/48142/a9-dualling-luncarty-to-pass-of-birnam-new-cycle-and-pedestrian-paths.pdf
Do you the exact situation?

112479064 about 4 years ago

Hi, if there are two house numbers here you'd be better adding two nodes with the separate address details.

107426328 about 4 years ago

Why did you change node/4457628592/history to a man_made=communications_tower?

112368378 about 4 years ago

Is the ATM still there?

111914512 about 4 years ago

Hi, not sure why you moved these buildings?

111463275 about 4 years ago

Can you provide a link to where you got the coastline from? Seems to be slightly different to OS StreetView's blue MHWS.
Also, are you able to reconnect the various streams that used to connect to the coastline, e.g. node/282465190

111855374 about 4 years ago

Thanks for adding this - however I don't think it needs an access tag as there's nothing restricting them to just customers? :)

111743371 about 4 years ago

Thanks, I've extended the path through the trees and adjusted the fences, hopefully that matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add any of the house numbers around here if you know them :)