A secondary road class for these highways are too high. Barangay access roads are typically tagged as tertiary roads, and roads leading to remote sitios as unclassified.

Kindly refer to the Philippine Mapping Convention for guidance: https://.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions

Good to see you contributing again! Thank you.

You probably would want to tag the falls and the cave entrance separately

Thank you!

There is no legal definition for living_street in PH, but in the West these are roads where pedestrians are prioritized, and motor vehicles are tolerated to use at much lower speeds. Previously, this alley was defined as a footway, which is markedly different from a living_street. Do you have additional details to support this change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73372305

However, if you're adding a no left-turn restriction for vehicles coming from McKinley heading to CP Garcia, you chose the wrong members for your restriction. You may want to check it again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73235823

Using iD is just as good as JOSM. This no left-turn restriction is redundant to the no u-turn resriction, relation/5697218 added by Eugene in 2015.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73235823

Should this be a no u-turn or a no left-turn restriction? The restriction you added is no-left-turn, and there does'nt seem to a road for turning left to.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73235823

Try to save as often as possible, with smaller changesets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73297004

if other motor vehicles is not allowed, you must an explicit motor_vehicles=no. Also, the use of layer=1 is an indicator that the highway is above ground. Is this a bridge?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73297214

Try to elaborate on your changeset comments. "test" is not very helpful.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73605198

I'm in the wrong here, and you're right, Eugene.

@GrabPHPrince, when you do split roads, try to make sure that you split the other crossing roads in the vicinity, as well.

Why delete existing features for no good reason, when your edits rae minor?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73605198

Avoid abbreviations. Use "Rosal Street" instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73616426

Thank you for the quick and positive response.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73821069

Thank you for the quick and positive response.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73821069

Why delete the existing road segment ,when you only need to align them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73530034

http://i.imgur.com/7QmVzlv.png

What kind of barriers are these? Try to be more specific than `barrier=yes`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73530330

Why remove the noexit=yes tag? What do you mean by motor_vehicle=no, on a node along a highway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73601389

Are you sure that this is a valid ferry route? This was an administrative boundary relation. Also, are you sure that motor_vehicles are allowed in the Pasig River Ferry system? I don't think so, but please provide reference docs to help us evaluate this change better.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73649469