OpenStreetMap
GOwin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 37558348 | almost 10 years ago | Hello. Congratulations on your new edits! To make more change set comments useful, how about writing something like "digitized building", or "traced commercial building" instead of a vague "First digitized"? |
| 37428405 | almost 10 years ago | Kindly refer to changeset/37558311 for the modifications I made. And to the boundary=protected_area as reference for detailed mapping of protected areas. Also, the Lifecycle Prefix tags: osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Thanks for the contribution. Keep on mapping! |
| 37428405 | almost 10 years ago | ... based on the Senate bill. |
| 37428405 | almost 10 years ago | Also, perhaps you would consider reverting the AMWS boundaries back to version 1, then create a new boundary tagged with a `proposed:` prefix |
| 37428405 | almost 10 years ago | Thank you for the prompt response. Much appreciated. I brought this changeset to the attention of some of the local OSM mappers and mentioned that it's premature to modify the boundaries based on a bill. Please check out the `proposed:` life cycle tag prefix which seems appropriate in this case: osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix With reference to Agusan Marsh, as a protected area, the Ramos-era Executive Order is the prevailing law, and defines the AMWS boundary. The marsh, as a natural feature, is still undefined until we obtain better data or imagery. Please join the informal, online discussions of the local OpenStreetMap community at http://is.gd/osmphchat Sorry for the short reply. I'm mobile. I'll elaborate when I get back to my computer. |
| 37413232 | almost 10 years ago | What do you mean by your "Fix me" comments? What kind of help do you need? |
| 37428405 | almost 10 years ago | Hello. Can you provide a link to your source? This appears to be just a *bill* and is not a law, and will not have any legal weight. |
| 37321139 | almost 10 years ago | Hi Eli. It's not necessary to tag hydrants with name, like
For details, check out:
Great to see you using OsmAnd now. :) |
| 35677966 | almost 10 years ago | What are the sources of these edits? |
| 37118053 | almost 10 years ago | Try this grid, Lucas: http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1509#task/62 |
| 37239025 | almost 10 years ago | As long as the data you're mapping is on-the-ground, and can be validated, i don't see why it should be a problem. |
| 37242448 | almost 10 years ago | what do you mean by "this edition" and what "important study" are you referring to? |
| 37118053 | almost 10 years ago | Hello Lucas. You might want to wait for the Paypay tasking before you update this area, which should utilize the new MapGive imagery. |
| 37174889 | almost 10 years ago | Am glad to see you still mapping! If you're looking for mapping tips, check out the wiki pages: * [PH Mapping Convetions] (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions)
For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other OSM-PH contributors through any of the following: * [Discourse Chat](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
We all look forward to more edits from you. Please feel free to get in touch any time. Regards,
|
| 36904555 | almost 10 years ago | Here, check out an existing route:
|
| 36904555 | almost 10 years ago | Cool! I hope you'd complete the Green Frog bus route relation, too. :) For your reference: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Buses If you need anything, ping other mappers for a hand:
|
| 36874534 | almost 10 years ago | Are you sure about that tag for a "stage"? A public building looks alright, but a `shelter` doesn't look appropriate.
In the Philippines, a "stage" is probably best tagged as amenity=theater. See: amenity=theatre |
| 36871993 | almost 10 years ago | @rukku
|
| 36871739 | almost 10 years ago |
highway=bus_stop tags are not incorrect, and is usable for routing apps and software. If this node is also a shelter, simply add:
Removing bus_stop is unnecessary. Kindly revert, and simply add the shelter tag. For reference, see: highway=bus_stop Thank you. |
| 36871993 | almost 10 years ago | Rukku,
|