OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
49654446 over 8 years ago

Is this the old home of Paz Marquez-Benitez?

49455774 over 8 years ago

It would be nice to leave descriptive notes for change set comments, to help other mappers understand the changes you just made.

48789923 over 8 years ago

Hello. Welcome to OSM.

Changeset comments are meant to descriptive notes you leave for other mappers, to help them understand better any changes you made to the map.

49413725 over 8 years ago

Thanks for the edits!

The tag `building=government` is a proposed tag and not as mature as the equivalent `building=public` tag.

Also, when inputing phone numbers, make sure they follow the international format +<country_code><access_code><phone_number>.

49414860 over 8 years ago

These are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags.

Please fix. :) Thanks!

Also, "evacuation_center=yes" is deprecated.

See https://app.simplenote.com/p/XrwB6X

49413408 over 8 years ago

These are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags.

Please fix. :) Thanks!

Also, "evacuation_center=yes" is deprecated.

See https://app.simplenote.com/p/XrwB6X

49415095 over 8 years ago

Sir, these are secondary / multi-functional shelters, and you're missing the "emergency:" prefix for tags.

please fix. :) Thanks!

49301039 over 8 years ago

Thanks for the continued contribution, jmbangate.

I don't see why this particular change set comment is any worse than say a blank one.

Besides, #osmphcitieschallenge is one of the oldest, active hashtags in PH mapping, largely because of this mapper.

49324239 over 8 years ago

Thanks for helping out. We appreciate the help.

Also, we received your GitHub comment.

49088918 over 8 years ago

Thank you for adding data to OSM. But please, be kind enough to edit them on your computer so they are classified correctly.

You're only generically tagging them as shop=computer.

48987881 over 8 years ago

Hi there. Kindly do not tag buildings with landuse=residential.

If you want to classify how buildings are used, you may, for example change this to `building=house` or `building=residential`, whichever is appropriate for your use case.

Landuse tags are meant to be classify large geographic areas, to indicate how humans use the land.

Ref: landuse=*

Kindly revert these changes. If you need help with that you can contact the local OSM community for your concerns, or other details:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph

or fb.com/osmph

Please feel free to contact us for assistance.

48988468 over 8 years ago

typo: `1building=residential` should read as `building=residential`

48988468 over 8 years ago

Hi there. Kindly do not tag buildings with landuse=residential.

If you want to classify how buildings are used, you may, for example change this to `building=house` or 1building=residential`, whichever is appropriate for your use case.

Landuse tags are meant to be classify large geographic areas, to indicate how humans use the land.

Ref: landuse=*

Kindly revert these changes. If you need help with that you can contact the local OSM community for your concerns, ask for assistance, or other details:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph

or fb.com/osmph

48903009 over 8 years ago

Thanks! I opened a ticket here, and proposed next steps: https://git.io/vHOPC

48903009 over 8 years ago

Do you have contact information of the office/department leading this effort?

48749193 over 8 years ago

Barangay halls are tagged as amenity=townhall and townhall:type=village.

For reference, refer to Philippine mapping conventions: https://goo.gl/kyf0iU

48616513 over 8 years ago

Hi Pons. Kamusta na kayo?

Nakita niyo na ba yung bagong imagery from DigiGlobe?

Sa right sidebar, click on background layer, then select DigiGlobe para makita at ma-compare niyo.

48355643 over 8 years ago

Hello there. These are very good contributions to OpenStreetMap. Are you connected with any organization, or is visiting waterfalls one of your past times?

48182455 over 8 years ago

@Upendra

While using a park tag on a node is not ideal, it's not a good enough reason to delete them. Some users may use a node to temporarily tag a park, when there's no available imagery in the area (i.e., cloud cover).

In this case, this person is a new mapper, and I agree with your suggestion that they should add a way to define the boundaries of the park and merge it with this node.

43369049 over 8 years ago

Hi there. May I know the source you used for these digitized features?