Friendly_Ghost's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175749035 | 2 days ago | Hi there. Please, please stop arbitrarily grouping landuse areas. This serves no purpose and it makes the areas impossible to work with. On top of that the slim sections around greenfields are plainly wrong. I'm also sending you this message privately in case you miss this. |
| 173727627 | about 2 months ago | That's not how that works. Putting stop nodes at the stop lines is an improvement in all situations, regardless of how many ways cross at an intersection. |
| 151919239 | 3 months ago | Hoi Marc, Meestal zet ik deze note tag neer als een gebouw gesloopt is. Ik kan me verder deze specifieke situatie niet herinneren. Mvg,
|
| 153126170 | 3 months ago | Interessante situatie. Ik zit momenteel niet achter m'n pc, dus voel je vrij om mijn wijziging van deze laadpaal ongedaan te maken. |
| 171970773 | 3 months ago | In that case GSE is just the name of the company and not specifically of the site, so operator=GSE (or GSE Italia) would be a more suitable tag. |
| 171970773 | 3 months ago | Thank you for adding the missing building. What does GSE mean? |
| 170516027 | 4 months ago | I gave up on that concept. Anyway, we have good review tools like better-osm-org, OSMcha and OSM changeset visualiser, so this shouldn't be much of a problem. I also discussed this already with the broader community on the forum and people seemed to approve of it, so if you have something to add to that discussion, please do. |
| 170122879 | 4 months ago | My edit has already been reverted without my prior knowledge. |
| 170631278 | 4 months ago | Hi. Why did you revert my edit without even mentioning it to me? |
| 170122879 | 4 months ago | So the information is not redundant. I never said that. I said that explicit tags are redundant, because the information is already in the data. |
| 170122879 | 4 months ago | You can take the length from the length of the OSM way. If this doesn't match with the signed length, then either the sign or the OSM data is incorrect. |
| 170122879 | 4 months ago | The length of a road section is indicated by the length of the way. There is no indication in the data or in the documentation that this has anything to do with signage. |
| 170282495 | 4 months ago | Thank you, Spaghetti Monster <3 |
| 170123663 | 4 months ago | Reverted my own edit after discussion on Telegram OSM Italia. |
| 170123663 | 4 months ago | Hi Andrea. Casper here. As I mentioned in my changeset comment, they are redundant and should not be added to every road. I have tried to contact you about this before, but you haven't replied. |
| 170124713 | 4 months ago | Hi. Again, could you stop adding redundant tags to roads, please? |
| 168668887 | 5 months ago | Looks much better now. Thank you for the edit. |
| 166541055 | 7 months ago | This changeset had some conflicts, so I hope I haven't broken any relations. Let me know if you find anything that I broke and I'll happily repair it. |
| 166267215 | 7 months ago | Reverted spam |
| 166180613 | 7 months ago | Reverted spam |