FraserKp's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 148920883 | over 1 year ago | ha! Apologies, I didn't realise I was speaking to the Laird himself :) |
| 148920883 | almost 2 years ago | If you use the "Q" shortcut key in ID, it will make all the angles in the shape right angles, which I think would result in a tidier version of this building geometry. |
| 143708614 | about 2 years ago | Lots of number 11's, assume these are a copy/paste error? |
| 140996104 | over 2 years ago | new building geometries look a bit wonky - would suggest you use the orthoganalize tool in JOSM (ID has an equivalent) to tidy these up - it will turn all angles into right angles which I assume is correct here |
| 138923513 | over 2 years ago | Edinburgh bike hire scheme closed 2 years ago... https://transportforedinburgh.com/about/edinburgh-cycle-hire/ |
| 119517065 | over 3 years ago | Morrison St I agree is stands, thanks for correcting that, but here the bike racks are shin-high only-good-to-lock-a-wheel-too affairs so think anchors is correct. |
| 108910455 | over 4 years ago | Sadly not, I didn't survey, just reinstated the original tags having deleted the tagged node of the duplicate by accident in an earlier changeset |
| 105320256 | over 4 years ago | hi, nice work if you are new-ish to OSM as you profile suggests I might mention that both ID and Josm editors have functionality (q keyboard shortcut) which make all angles in a way right angles which makes building outlines much more accurate and speeds up adding them. |
| 65673039 | almost 7 years ago | "Experience", no? |
| 61074110 | over 7 years ago | Why? Has the car park been demolished? Deleting it because it was drawn in 2007 doesn't sound like a good reason... |
| 59209158 | over 7 years ago | Hi there - welcome to OpenStreetMap. Noticed this changeset was flagged for review. Building geometry looks good, I would remove the name tag - you have all that information already in the "addr:" ones. Also, the preferred addr: tagging would be against a node in the building outline which represents the front door to the property instead of the whole building outline itself - lots of others in the area use this convention so would be more consistent to follow suit. Otherwise great job & hope you are inspired to keep on mapping. |
| 54524277 | about 8 years ago | This looks like fantastic data, but streetmap dot co dot uk doesn't have an OSM compatible license as far as I can tell so anything derived from that will have to come out again I suspect.... |
| 52821426 | about 8 years ago | nice work! |
| 52142089 | over 8 years ago | Yes saw the social but can't make it this week, sorry. Have a good night. |
| 52142089 | over 8 years ago | ah, thanks - didn't notice all the building here have the addresses duplicated when I removed AR2 |
| 47750037 | over 8 years ago | Oh, nice & good to know iD has support too. |
| 47750037 | over 8 years ago | If you are adding buildings I heartily recommend using the orthogonalize function in Josm which will in a single stroke turn all angles into right angles on a building outline. Can't see any sign of an equivalent in iD which is unfortunate if that is your editor of choice. |
| 45561662 | almost 9 years ago | I think for trees, the name tag should only be used if the tree itself has a historical name, not to denote the species. See natural=tree |
| 45562498 | almost 9 years ago | You seem to have also removed a closed way which denoted tree coverage in the park - any reason why this was removed? |
| 44766647 | almost 9 years ago | Hi there - thanks for the heads up. I did tweak the parking slightly based on bing but it looked pretty much aligned to the imagery already - but will check the OSSV data for sure to make sure. The main thing I didn't get resolved was the building geometry - Deep Sea World itself obviously mostly sits underneath the car park so not sure how best to represent this - the building mapped as-is is only a tiny portion of the place itself. |