I changed it to disused:aerialway=zipline in changeset/174808040.
I'm fairly sure this was mapped in the past; someone must have deleted it, but I don't feel like investigating now.

Taj ziplajn nikad nije dobio upotrebnu dozvolu, a možda je i demontiran (nisam skoro gledao). Teško da je aerialway=goods?

Huh?! The whole map of Europe is filled with "paint", i.e. [landcover](osm.wiki/Landcover). Just because central Bačka is mostly farmland is not reason to delete the farmland polygons (and you also deleted meadows, scrubland and other stuff). When you delete stuff, how would someone know it isn't forest or wetland? And people use OSM for geospatial analysis of many kinds, not just for car navigation.

You are not entitled to remove valid landcover information for the entire municipality, which is certainly not "generic designation". If you do not want to see it, you can hide it in JOSM. Feel free to continue adding houses like you did before.

Reverted. Deleting this amount of valid mapping amounts to vandalism.

Reverted. This is blatant vandalism.

For the record, I hiked here and added this path back in 2020. It's a steep downhill slope that had been blazed by MTBers, but still passable at the time. Apparently, the nature took it back soon after due to lack of use. I have no objections to deleton, to prevent future incidents.

It's fine to tag the outer Kosovo boundaries as disputed (as well as disputed demarcations such as below the Pančić peak). However, adding admin units that only exist on paper is a bit too much in my opinion. If we follow that slope, we could tag all municipality and village borders as "disputed".

I question the idea of having defunct administrative units (at admin_level=6 no less) of a country that does not control the territory for 25 years, and has zero influence on the ground.

Besides, you don't even know how it's spelled.

...i otad je prošlo 6 meseci :)
Sredio sam ja.

Oni su sami dali nekom ćaciju da im unosi lokacije (a tako je i na Gugl mapama)... Međutim piše i "Botra bb, Benzinska stanica Miletić", što je na početku ulice, na Novobečejskom putu, i ima logike. Premestiću, al treba dvaput proveriti te njihove podatke (recimo, ekspozitura u NIS-ovoj zgradi je ucrtana u Limanski park).

Nešto sumnjam da se bankomat node/12643098056 nalazi na kraju ulice Botra u ataru, na ulazu u deponiju. Odakle su ti podaci?

Ovde si zeznuo geometriju multipoligona relation/10354175, a možda nije nikada ni valjala.

Pošto je kompleksan i redundantan sa samim centroidom staze, ja bih ga radije brisao nego popravljao, ali ti odluči.

There is a sign for "No agricultural machinery or bicycles" at
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=234514445099582
(and the same sign in westbound direction, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=381333979915579&focus=photo)

Whether that's sufficient to signify a "trunk", I'm not sure. But the whole Y-krak, including roundabouts, should have the same classification (trunk or primary).

Vratio sam Ćaci kroz changeset/163479995 :)

Zamolio me mmns se uključim, pa evo...

Elem, mislim da je tagovati tu kapiju sa "turistička atrakcija" bilo malo preuranjeno ili preambiciozno. Za početak, treba da bude "kapija" (barrier=gate). A i "Ćacijeva kapija" je pre opis nego pravo ime...

No, mislim da bi bilo adekvatno to vratiti tagovano otprilike kao tourism=artwork; artwork_type=graffiti; inscription="Ćaci u škole"... bar dok ne prekreče (što se možda neće desiti nikada).

Ovi putevi povezuju samo sela, imaju čak i oznaku 3xx za državne puteve IIb reda, prema tome su tertiary. Vraćam "izmenu". I molim te da u changeset komentar staviš neko obrazloženje, pogotovo za ovako bitne izmene.

Jeste greška, verovatno mi je iD ponudio preset pa ja kliknuo.

I resolved one batch (it will take a few iterations) through 161197843, and reported an issue to iD at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/10671

I'll fix them ASAP. I was relying on iD's warnings about crossing ways/disconnected ways, but they are produced haphazardly, leaving a lot of undetected ones. I will open an issue with iD.