Damn, description should have been "Removed redundant 'funding approved...' note"

Hello.
Do these roads actually exist?
They're not evident on Bing, and no GPS traces.
The connection and alignment also seems very odd.
Thanks

Olá.
Será que estas estradas realmente existe?
Eles não são evidentes no Bing, e sem vestígios de GPS.
A conexão e alinhamento também parece muito estranho.
obrigado

Buoys are not localities and should not be tagged as such.
Please retag using the approved seamark: tags.

That tag has been removed as there is a physical feature.
Please don't tag for the renderer, but ask for the renderer to be updated.

Hello. I have just removed the changes you made in those 3 changesets. You can re do them again without Google as a source if you want.

Thank you.
While the edits generally looked good and useful, we prefer to err on the side of caution with potentially copyright infringing data.
I would recommend updating the data in those 3 changesets again, using just your survey/GPS data.
Thanks
Deanna, DWG.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/38884124.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/38884124.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/38884124.

That is data.
Is this the only changeset you've sourced from Google?

You can't change the source once it's been uploaded, but you can remove any copyright infringing data that you've added and upload as a new changeset.

Can you confirm which data has been taken from Google?
This will stop us having to remove the entire changeset.

Thanks.

The old names have now been redacted too.

All names reverted and changes redacted:
changeset/38868998

Thanks

Welcome to OpenStreetmap and thank you for your updates.
However, OSM is only able to accept data that has been surveyed, or that we have explicit permission to use for licencing reasons.
The names that you've added have been removed as you say they have been sourced from Google.
Thanks, Deanna, DWG

Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap e obrigado por suas atualizações.
No entanto, OSM só é capaz de aceitar os dados que foram pesquisados, ou que temos permissão explícita para utilizar por motivos de licenciamento.
Os nomes que você adicionou foram removidos à medida que dizem ter sido obtida junto Google.
Obrigado, Deanna, DWG

Hello, while facts can't be copyrighted, we prefer not to use sources where we don't have explicit permission.
Google have surveyed that data, and make it available under a non open licence. Just as with any other data source, it could contain inaccuracies (accidental or deliberate), and that's what we want to remove.
I only see a handful of objects that are tagged as Google Streetview so no rush , but could do with a resurvey (maybe including more address data too :)
Many thanks!

Hello Ben.
Can you confirm what other data you've taken from Google?
Google's data is copyright and is not compatible with OpenStreetmap's licence which means we may have to strip all effected changesets.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

It looks like you accidentally removed the rest of the building though.
I have corrected this for you, and used the correct tags for a beauty parlour.
Would you be able to add the rest of the contact details?

Thanks

I assume you wanted this reverted? Done in changeset/38198986. Thanks

I assume you wanted this reverted? Done in changeset/38198986. Thanks