OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
57485080 over 3 years ago

Hi
way/572632089/history
If this is a harbour, why is it tagged as a dock.
Is "Tidal Harbour" its official name?

57398429 over 3 years ago

Hi
As there's a lock gate, is this tidal?
way/113976843/history

69580703 over 3 years ago

Hi
Should these be lakes or ponds rather than the erroneous 'natural'?
way/685975795
way/685975793#map=19/51.76564/-0.44535

82212012 over 3 years ago

Hi
On various changesets
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hir

you've added water=natural. This is a mistake.
water=*#Possible_tagging_mistakes

Example:
way/40858580/history

Could you amend them so they have relevant tags:
water=*?uselang=en#Natural_features

119033560 almost 4 years ago

Hi
way/224675858#map=19/51.43573/-3.17454

All railway stations are already mapped as nodes. This was accurately tagged as a train station building.

109354808 almost 4 years ago

...Is the footbridge a designated cycle route?

109354808 almost 4 years ago

Hi
Why was the footbridge over the A467? Wouldn't it provide access to Forge Mews?

118977117 almost 4 years ago

Hi
Where did you get your data from?
Do you have a link?

There are multiple 'LCA 15' footpaths
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hb6

They need to be distinguished by their full refs as supplied the the relevant local authorities.

94371217 almost 4 years ago

It doesn't look like it's a vehicle entrance/exit.
https://osmz.ru/imagery/#20/51.44778/-0.10134/bing

94371217 almost 4 years ago

Hi
Is this really a service road with access to the main road?
way/854079450/history

112720877 almost 4 years ago

What makes you think I haven't?

50336092 almost 4 years ago

Hi
way/508028510

If accessible by motor vehicle, shouldn't this be track rather than footway?

50205899 almost 4 years ago

Hi
way/477777921/history
Which of these is correct? skatepark or water feature?

117564708 almost 4 years ago

FYI
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117564708

118640891 almost 4 years ago

What makes you think I haven't attempted to converse with him?

This relation is an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.It isn't even an admin boundary. No land uses conjoin with it. In fact *nothing* is attached to it.
I spent a lot of my OSM time inserting the AONB from the official source. I'm now spending further time maintaining it after contributors such as Brian inaccurately manipulate the ways to reduce the quality of the OSM database.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1h1L

113434143 almost 4 years ago

I've reverted your vandalizing changeset where you deleted valid PROWs footpaths.
Example:
way/42333646/history

And falsely resized fairways & other golf features.

113434143 almost 4 years ago

This edit is vandalism. Do not delete entities just because you're unable to comprehend them.

118567841 almost 4 years ago

Please stop attaching physical objects to non-physical boundaries. You're reducing the quality of the OSM database.

118445309 almost 4 years ago

Hi
For golf bunkers please tag with 'surface=sand' instead of 'natural'. It's an error in iD editor.

118475019 almost 4 years ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM
The name tag is for specific assigned names not a generic description such as 'Bunker' or 'Hole 9'
bunkers should be tagged with 'surface=sand' instead of 'natural'. It's an error in iD editor.