Thank you.
Please ensure your other edits around the country also don't break waterways.

That's not the hole's name.
You need to find a more appropriate tag.

Hi
Is this road accessible to the public?
Currently it looks like construction vehicle access.
The submitted plans for the completed site show half of it a cul-de-sac & the rest a cycle path.

Have you performed a ground survey?

Who are the "drivers" you mention? How have they supplied feedback data to you?

Hi
This is the third changeset which falsely split water polygons passing beneath bridges.

Please refrain from making any future edits which reduce the quality of the OSM database.

Hi
You've split a water polygon around a bridge. This is incorrect mapping. Water flows under the bridge.
Please refrain from making erroneous edits.

Hi
Could you clarify what your intention was with this edit? You appear to have split the canal banks either side of the bridge. Why?

Which Keepright rule were you using?

Unsure why you believe there's a relation between Cotwold AONB & Land Registry Index Polygons

What surety is there that the Land Registry Index Polygons are correctly positioned?

Hi
If it's a bridleway could you update the highway tag.

Hi
way/428654685
Please don't add 'National Cycle Network' name tags to ways as they're already in the route relation.

The NCN relation is mapped as being along the path you mapped & the towpath. Which is correct?

The access=no tag is preventing routers from directing walkers along it. Was it added in error?

The name tag 'CNN33'. is that the Public Right of Way reference which should be in the 'prow_ref' tag?

Hi
Is there a reason this path is access=no?

Please don't amend the Cotswold AONB boundary. Don't attach an entities to it (residential in this changeset).
The AONB is set by Natural England & should not be manipulated to suit what OSM contributors believe to be accurate.

Please give descriptive comments to your changesets.

Accurate link:
https://cycle.travel/map/journey/305428

Stop repeatedly changing your name. It's childish.

"Do not tag incorrectly to suit the router/renderer" etc.

CycleTravel can navigate it correctly for bikes, yet OSRM and GraphHopper can't, so the failure appears to be with them. "To yield better outcomes than" incorrect tagging, contact them to request they amend their rules.

https://cycle.travel/map?lat=51.3779&lon=-2.3571&zoom=13

Hi
Reverting changeset as it's accessible to agricultural vehicles.
Contributors refuses to acknowledge which router can't route a track or bridleway.

Hi
You've double up on 'railway=station'
All railway stations are mapped as nodes. One per station.
Any buildings are tagged as building=train_station.

Hi
node/9634373179
Parallel to the public footpath along the section where your new path joins, there's a fence (Which I'm sure I mapped previously). Is it still there? is there a gate for your path to pass through it?

What is the tidal range?

How occasional is "occasionally"?
Note inside they're all moored to the docks side
Genuine "tidal moorings" (such as those at the sailing cub) are all moored away from any quay side.