Excellent work on adding postcodes https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/DE/

DE55 Alfreton had previously only had a few postcodes added from Amber Valley Food Standards and for existing objects from Code-Point Open centroids so is now much improved

If possible please add addr:city for the relevant post town Alfreton, Ashbourne, Burton-on-Trent, Derby, Matlock, Ripley, Bakewell, Ilkeston, Swadlincote and Belper only https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/DE.html for DE postcodes

Sometimes useful to add addr:suburb, addr:village or addr:town https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/addr-tags.html although I have only ever used addr:town for Wirksworth (DE4 addr:city = Matlock) and Castle Donington (DE74 addr:city = Derby)

I would not normally add postcodes for non-geographical (PO Boxes etc.) postcodes like node/12335209625 flagged as “Multiple Units at the same location (ML)” and excluded from the statistics https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/DE/DE55/4/ but is probably harmless to do so

As recently as December 2023 Companies House recorded an address change for Faux from 608 to 579 Mansfield Road although this could just be a correspondence address for an online business https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13175837/filing-history
08 Dec 2023 Registered office address changed from 680 Mansfield Road Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG5 2GE United Kingdom to 579 Mansfield Road Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG5 2JN on 8 December 2023

Without checking on the ground I assumed Faux must have moved across the Mansfield road from 608 to 579
Both Faux and Pudding Pantry are listed at 579 for the postcode https://ratings.food.gov.uk/authority-search-landing/899?address-search=NG5+2JN&business_type=-1&hygiene_rating=all&range=Equal (no date of inspection for Faux)
If Faux is closed then would be easy to tidy just leaving Pudding Pantry

DE Post Towns https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/DE.html

Excellent work on adding postcodes https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/DE/ DE1, DE4, DE5, DE45 and DE72 should be showing 100% when the statistics are next refreshed.
If possible please add addr:city for the relevant post town Derby, Matlock, Ripley, Bakewell etc.
Sometimes useful to add addr:suburb, addr:village or addr:town https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/addr-tags.html although I have only ever used addr:town for Wirksworth (DE4 addr:city = Matlock)

I've no objection to this being updated to variety_store and perhaps way/133732739 in Derby also needs updating
I don't know the detail of Cushty Bargains but the variety of goods sold must include some foods https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1520728/cushty-bargains

In July 2022 I incorrectly updated the 25 Underhill Close house to a Go Local Extra based on the 30 June 2022 Food Standards entry https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1526762/go-local-extra-derby now reverted and mapped as a terrace house again way/630957133

Thanks for fixing the duplicated cottage name way/662674262
Not sure if the Ordnance Survey can be asked to update their OpenMap to match "Tithebarn" as they are often used by Google, OSM and others as the master
I was not consiously surveying this afternoon but I cycled past a "Tithe Barn Gardens" in Repton way/966866953 and "Tithe" is the spelling I would expect for 10% of income or a 10% of a harvest donated
Your sources and edits look good

Probably needs checking on the ground.
OS OpenMap Local (April 2024) suggests "Tythebarn Lane" (one word with a y) and there is a "Tythe Barn Cottage" (two words with a y) way/662674262 (and another "Tythe Barn Cottage" way/662674259 which may also need checking as it seems unlikely that there are two cottages with the same name

Bumble Inn Peterborough node/4331512852
New Bubble Inn in Coton-in-the-Elms way/550157535

The "Bubble Inn"
The update was correct but when entering the changeset comments I accidently used the name of this micropub in Peterborough https://www.openstreetmap.orgnode/4331512852 that I often visit when working in the area

As well as using the notes layer and resolving some issues shown in the iD layer you can also see a list of things to check on the ground using the Survey Me! tool https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#17/52.72442/-1.37374

The address has been updated but the location has not changed so it is 10 miles away from Birkinstyle Lane
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/#DE
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/DE/DE55/6/#6BS
Probably easiest to remove the details in Hucknall and to create a new node at the correct location in Shirland

Makes sense. Travis Perkins has a very large footprint perhaps the Southern half of way/334253463 so could easily include a Benchmarx.
I'll update but will also walk/cycle past to double check

I'll check within the next week

Was certainly on Eagle Park 3 years ago changeset/105875388 but might have moved

I was at the Northedge Business Park in July and mapped everything I could see from the Tiny Tap node/12025713860 and did not see Benchmarx but will visit again and check

The change from footway to corridor has resulted in them not displaying on the standard map. Looks a bit wrong with the roof top service roads showing but not the walkways inside
They show correctly on https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#21/52.91956/-1.47383 but not osm.org/#map=19/52.919438/-1.472782

No numbers on the gate post but the houses either side are 334 and 338 so assume it must be 336

Details confirmed after cycling past and checking.
342 is way/344116332

Has been updated using Mapillary images way/344116332

way/1040256298 and way/187883763 have access = no and way/1040256302 has access = private
Does this access need updating?