OpenStreetMap
CycleStreets's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4687662 | CycleStreets | Paths need mapping - the area is not properly covered |
|||
| 4686090 | CycleStreets | The gate here has no access tag. |
|||
| 2301918 | CycleStreets | Is there a private link here used informally at least for cycling? We've had feedback: "Routes using the Babraham Institute cycle path do not seem to use the (private) link road opposite the pub. I think this is part of the official route." |
|||
| 4657689 | CycleStreets | There has clearly become a de-facto path in this area: https://x.com/johnmbrampton/status/1898745526033486316 This should be drawn in at the relevant locations, e.g. highway=track, informal=yes, surface=dirt |
|||
| 4656718 | CycleStreets | A newspaper article notes there are now wand-separated tracks alongside: |
|||
| 4613616 | CycleStreets | Is this really 30 mph? Other streets are not. |
|||
| 4631058 | This should have motor_vehicle=no not access=no: the public can access it as far as I can tell. Please can anyone with local knowledge check and update. |
||||
| 4635154 | CycleStreets | Sections of this are marked as bicycle=no, foot=no, which is unusual. Is there even a pavement? If so, could that please be drawn in explicitly? |
|||
| 4602239 | Cygnus1981 | This is busway. The asphalt road doesn't show on the map at all. Is this correct ? |
|||
| 4602238 | Cygnus1981 | This is busway - but cycles are allowed. The asphalt road doesn't show on the map at all. Is this correct ? |