On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

access=private

changeset/159394825

On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

access=private

changeset/159394800

On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

access=private

changeset/159394750

That's not something we map...

way/1236690319

I have no clue what you are trying to say....

I understand what the term means. In this context it is referring to the fact that personal info was mapped and should have never been mapped. An informal trail through the woods shouldn't be mapped in that manner.

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159348485

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159307408

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159307408

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159307408

Changeset reverted.

This is not how you map a golf course with fake buildings.

I have kindly asked you to stop removing features and to stop deleting additional details.

I have no clue why you feel the need to remove this business and others that were added:

way/1333651247/history

I have no choice but to again revert this changeset. You removed features that did exist and were verified, such as:

You also readded a business that no longer exists and was properly removed.
node/5405662903

This feature was expanded in detail from node to an area and the no longer existing railway was removed as per OSM guidelines that only what currently exists should be mapped:
node/3689959332

The area of this parking lot was correct until you reverted it:
way/143516497

These features no longer exist with absolutely no trace as they have been completely overbuilt by new buildings or new features that would require complete excavation of whatever may have been there before:
way/18061238
way/1145709152
way/1145709158
way/858360088
way/858360087
way/1005601387
way/1005601389
way/1005601388
way/862434339

These features were updated to reflect that part of the railway was indoors, yet you removed this bit of detail by carelessly reverting:
way/125706145
way/125706151
way/125706138
way/125706148
way/125706143
way/125706135

Again, I ask you to stop reverting en masse. This is a community with a simple guideline, map only what is on the ground and can be verified. Features that no longer exist do not belong on OSM. You are causing damage to the map and data and I have already asked you to stop but was met with antagonism and hostility via your profile page.

osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/159148496

As I had commented before, only features that currently exist should be mapped. Features that no longer exist should not be mapped on OSM, and should instead be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMap). I tried to engage previously, but was met with hostility and antagonism (referring to your profile page).

You have reverted changesets nilly-willy, without checking that the features removed were actually overbuilt and replaced. And in the process of your careless reverts, you have removed many valid additions, including new railways, new buildings, landuses, etc.

Again, I can't stress this enough, OSM is only for what *currently* exists and can be verified, not for what once exists. I have asked you to stop adding (or readding) features that no longer exist and have been built over/replaced and to cease the hasty deletion/reverts of new features that have been verified.

osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=Do%20not%20map%20objects%20if%20they%20do%20not%20exist%20currently

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159113830

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159113827

Looks like I'm your first edit review. Allow me to mark your first changeset as "Good". Keep up the good work, and always happy to see your contributions.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159098587

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159113792

Ah, gotcha. Thanks Allison!

Rand 88 - when you submit a changeset, please use a changeset comment to describe or state what you did. For example "Added roads in woods from aerial imagery" helps immensely when reviewing OSM edits.

Thanks, and see you around.

-CurlingMan13

Changeset reverted. Access tags should be used instead.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/159062083

What do you mean when you say "Not reported" ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159027381