Verify it even exists. A number of other features mapped by the user are questionable.

No BTC atm here...

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "(No comment)" doesn't tell me anything about what you did.

As I have previously mentioned on your previous changesets, please stop deleting to readd features.

You should read why here:
osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146255564

When mapping golf courses, do not overlap landcovers. The fairways should not overlap the golf greens.

I encourage you to read up and avoid common mapping pitfalls here:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

Is this what replaced "Bar Uni" ?

Is there a reason you didn't remove "Bar Uni" and close your note?

When features are "private", they are not access=no. It should be access=private.

I have corrected this feature, but please be aware for future edits.

Please do not perform tests on the live OSM server. This is not allowed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146202943

'This changeset has been reverted in part or full. The feature is still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the feature. You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.'

changeset/146232665

'This changeset has been reverted in part or full. The feature is still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the feature. You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.'

changeset/146232665

'This changeset has been reverted in part or full. The feature is still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the feature. You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.'

changeset/146232615

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Do not delete features that still exist. If you are updating the features, please just manipulate what is there to maintain revision history of the features.

changeset/146162107

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

changeset/146089738

Why did you delete the golf cartpath just to redraw it?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146086646

Features should not have descriptive names when there are better tags that can be used.

Do not purposely change lakes to water hazards. This is a lake, not just some golf feature. I have reverted this changeset in part or full to return this feature to a lake.

When mapping buildings, "Q" can/should be used to square the buildings.