'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/141443650

User readded these no longer existing features. I have gone through and removed the ones that don't exist.

These railway features do not exist (at least anymore). These no longer existing features should be added to OpenHistoricalMaps where it can live on forever. OHM is designed for historical features.

Since these "abandoned/razed" railways gave been completely removed, they should not be added to OSM. These ways should be removed, and instead be added to OHM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#:~:text=Place%20where%20railway,can%20be%20mapped.

Do not create "fake" holes by "lollipopping" areas. Multi-polygon relations should be used instead...

Do not map areas such that they partially overlap. The green should either not overlap with the fairway or it should be wholly within the fairway. I have gone ahead and fixed it, but - please be more careful of this in the future.

Partial overlaps throw all sorts of error flags, thus requiring more scrutiny.

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141357041

Additionally, after reviewing your previous changesets, I have already asked you to use better changeset comments.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also, the water area is not a water hazard. Tags should not be falsely added for a game or renderer.

Do not create "holes" by lollipopping the area, such as what you did on Hole 9. I have fixed this for you.

Do not partially overlap areas. I have fixed this. Please take a look so you understand how to do it in the future.

Also, do not partially overlap areas (as you have done for the green and fairway). They should either not overlap at all, or the smaller area should be wholly within the larger area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853

Please use more constructive changeset comments. What did you change? Why? Etc.?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853