CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138525952 | over 2 years ago | Added it back in as a private driveway. |
| 136707339 | over 2 years ago | Landuse/Landcover and roads should not be snapped to power lines. I have cleaned up the portion by the golf course. |
| 138525952 | over 2 years ago | Good enough of an edit. Thanks for joining and taking care of it.
|
| 138525952 | over 2 years ago | Good enough of an edit. Thanks for joining and taking care of it.
|
| 137898186 | over 2 years ago | Where did you get the reference # info? I know you got the shape from street imagery, but reference info isn't visible there. I just want to make sure it is correct - if you know what I mean. Also, welcome to OSM! |
| 138484262 | over 2 years ago | Again, do not name cartpaths. this changeset has been reverted in part or full. |
| 138484016 | over 2 years ago | As with all the others, the cartpaths should not be named. Also, do not "lollipop" features such as the fairway around the sand bunker. |
| 138484184 | over 2 years ago | Hi again... Please do not use descriptive tags to describe a cartpath. It has been addressed. Also, the sections that are a bridge over water should be changed to a bridge.
|
| 138481551 | over 2 years ago | cartpaths should not be named. Also, bridges should be added where it goes over water, as appropriate. |
| 138474960 | over 2 years ago | Revert changeset didn't work |
| 138456227 | over 2 years ago | Why did you remove road names? This is being reverted in part or full to restore info that was removed.
|
| 95013592 | over 2 years ago | 1) Please use changeset comments and include what you changed and why. 2) This is not a bridge. The other way should have been a tunnel. Fixed.
|
| 84358018 | over 2 years ago | You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles. |
| 84359390 | over 2 years ago | You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles. This changeset requires some cleanup to address this. Other features should be checked as well. |
| 138442809 | over 2 years ago | Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
|
| 138060677 | over 2 years ago | They wasted no time to change it back... Looks like they just ignored you and did it again everywhere. |
| 138241957 | over 2 years ago | I mean, regardless of whether it is closed or not, the fact that there are vendors here pretty much confirms it is a pedestrian area. Can you elaborate on why this isn't a pedestrian area? |
| 138062701 | over 2 years ago | The user got rid of the pedestrian tags again... They did here among a few others. Might be worth shooting a message off to DWG. |
| 138400959 | over 2 years ago | Looks good. FYI - you can also add private driveways at the end, being sure to use the tag "access=private" This would highlight the fact of where the road ends.
|
| 103503784 | over 2 years ago | FYI, if you don't feel like adding in a building (obvious if they don't resemble what is on the imagery), then you can just place nodes/points instead. |