OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 133412181 | almost 3 years ago | This is a lake/pond, not a water hazard. This edit is being reverted.
|
| 92275147 | almost 3 years ago | I know, but at least you do it right and add useful things to the map, and do so correctly, unlike some people. *cough cough* ...Who are still being cleaned up after. |
| 92275147 | almost 3 years ago | These are some good imports! Even doing building parts! Man, if only you could get the same data and do this type of import around Atlanta to replace a bunch of other sub-par imports! :D |
| 133371510 | almost 3 years ago | Looks like they all need some love here. Will you be addressing the bad buildings here, such as:
|
| 133366407 | almost 3 years ago | Please use multipolygons to map areas with an "island" in the middle.
Additionally, please do not use descriptive names to describe a feature. |
| 108552404 | almost 3 years ago | I'm not going to go through and list every single one... way/967154977
It's suffice to say, these were not manually reviewed... |
| 85716773 | almost 3 years ago | Please use a more changeset comment. What did you change, and why? |
| 108552403 | almost 3 years ago | Reverted in:
|
| 133219587 | almost 3 years ago | What source did you use to 1) know this was going to be built, and 2) know the alignment of the roadway? |
| 133306639 | almost 3 years ago | What source did you use to add these non-existent railways? There is no evidence on the ground of some of these railways that do not meet the definition of "abandonded". Please do not add items that have no trace or remnants on the ground. There are no ties, rails, signals, etc., and instead it was largely overbuilt and replaced by buildings, roadways and other features. These should be removed from OSM since they no longer exist, but should be added to OHM instead. Adding items for "historical" purposes isn't permitted on OSM, and I know we have had this discussion before about you adding non-existent items, and continuing to add them back. Where did you get the start dates for these items? They definitely wouldn't appear on an elevation map. Additionally, I suspect this was an import, but I digress on this point for now. |
| 108552403 | almost 3 years ago | These aren't even buildings... These are just random nodes. |
| 133312260 | almost 3 years ago | Please add info to your changeset features. What did you add, and why? "." Doesn't tell me anything about what you changed, why or any source that may have been used to trace the history of various things on the map. Thanks! |
| 133301505 | almost 3 years ago | Please do not add descriptive names to the map when they aren't the real name of the item, or anything beyond just a description of the feature. |
| 133312201 | almost 3 years ago | Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
|
| 133136085 | almost 3 years ago | It is an open source project that has rules that need to be followed. Using good changeset comments is one of them, as well as only mapping things that exist, and mapping them correctly. Continuing to not follow rules and guidelines will have consequences. |
| 133194607 | almost 3 years ago | Please use "access=private" tags instead.
|
| 133277073 | almost 3 years ago | What does "bs" mean? |
| 133277340 | almost 3 years ago | STOP. Please add better changeset comments. Read this for more info:
|
| 133277396 | almost 3 years ago | STOP! READ THIS BEFORE CONTINUING!
|
| 133277274 | almost 3 years ago | As mentioned in previous changesets, please use more details than just "bs". What did you change, and why? Good changeset comments are very important for contrbuting to OSM.
|