Hello, welcome to OSM. You requested a review of your changeset. I have reviewed it and found all changes done correctly. Good edits and best of luck with your new business!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153864146

Hello! You requested a review of your chageset. I have reviewed your changeset, and it looks good. Only error was missing a "+" at the start of the phone number. I have fixed this for you.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153877357

Welcome to OSM! I see you added your business. You were 95% of the way there. I went ahead and cleaned up the tags for you. :) Best of luck on the new business!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153877986

I have review this changeset. Edits look good. Have a wonderful day and happy mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153870072

Welcome to OSM. Couple pointers:

1) Do not overlap paths (cartpaths and road ways). Only one should be present.

2) Do not add duplicate areas (fairways, greens, etc.)

3) Do not apply descriptive names such as "Hole 7 fairway".

Other than those, the edit looks decent and I look forward to seeing you around. I went ahead and made the corrections here for you here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153826366

Reverted changeset/153719306

changeset/153719306

User readded festures that were previously deleted. For more info, see

osm.org/user_blocks/16403

Changeset reverted. As you were told before, do not delete features just because they are "private." Access tags should be used instead.

Deletion is not the answer, especially when it is clear it exists on aerial imagery. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Also, as for your address request:
183 East Wears Valley Road, Pigeon Forge, TN 37863

changeset/153725635

Hello and welcome to OSM!

Instead of deleting it, access tags should be used instead. We can see they exist, they just aren't public. We control access using access tags for all sorts of things: Parking lots, roadways, front entrances to a person's house.

access=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153641186

Nice work. Looks great. Good edit.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153638253

Adding discussion from our messages so it is public.

This area is now a preserve. It looks like someone had tried to readd the golf course prior to my edits and I re-removed the golf course addition. Feel free to edit back to what it was prior to then and how you see fit. Happy mapping and thanks for the pleasant discussion. :)

https://www.conservationfund.org/projects/preservation-of-the-former-vistoso-golf-course-in-oro-valley-arizona

As soon as I submitted, I was like "crap - I should have split out that one in Germany. Oh well, they will let me know." Maybe a bbox splitter can be incorporated into the revert tool.

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153674082

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153674082

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153674082

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961

Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

changeset/153673961