OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 153443703 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153442095 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153441559 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153438854 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153438590 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153438367 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153438100 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153437710 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153433757 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153433500 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153432297 | over 1 year ago | Hello, This changeset has been reverted in part or full. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground. I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been). In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists. "Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ . You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
|
| 153432297 | over 1 year ago | Can you explain why you removed the official name from a footpath and added railway tags? |
| 152690162 | over 1 year ago | Do not partially overlap areas...
|
| 152690564 | over 1 year ago | Again, do not partially overlap areas... This is not the first time I have brought it up...
|
| 153090452 | over 1 year ago | Just use multipolygon relations instead of confusing area art.
|
| 153178050 | over 1 year ago | Just use multipolygon relations instead of all these seperate and creative area drawings...
|
| 152903365 | over 1 year ago | Reverted. Access tags should be used instead of deletion. Read more here: |
| 152903365 | over 1 year ago | Access tags should be used instead of deletion. All of these roadways are clearly visible on aerial imagery and should be mapped. Read more here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
|
| 152903931 | over 1 year ago | Reverted. Access tags should be used instead of deletion. Read more here: |
| 152916680 | over 1 year ago | Good catch. Hard to keep up with people sometimes.
|