Before making further edits on OSM, you shoudl review the following:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

You made a couple mistakes which I have kindly resolved here:
1) You didn't add the beiges for the cartpath over the water. you just left it as disconnected.
2) You should not name features like tees or fairways. The name=* tag is not used for these features and should be left blank.
3) You partially overlapped landcovers. Areas should not partially overlap.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146603640

Before making further edits on OSM, you shoudl review the following:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

You made a couple mistakes which I have kindly resolved here:
1) You didn't add the beiges for the cartpath over the water. you just left it as disconnected.
2) You should not name features like tees or fairways. The name=* tag is not used for these features and should be left blank.
3) You partially overlapped landcovers. Areas should not partially overlap.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146603969

Trails that are on private property should not be removed... Access tags should be used instead, "access=private".

You can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

I recommend you revert this changeset, restore the trails and then add access tags as appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147032660

Couple things:
1) Please do not delete features just to readd them. When possible, existing features should be manipulated. In this way, we can preserve revision history of the feature.
2) Please do not partially overlap landcovers. Fairways and greens should not overlap. I have gone ahead and fixed this just once for you.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147035464

Please stop deleting trails just because you declare them "private", but they have been confirmed to exist.

Access tags should be used instead of deletion. I have reverted your latest attempt to delete these ways.

Again, this changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together.

You can read why it won't be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/146998754

These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist. You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist. Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

changeset/146963416

These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist. You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist. Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

changeset/146963416

These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist. You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist. Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

changeset/146963416

These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist. You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist. Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

changeset/146963416

These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist. You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist. Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

changeset/146963416

Also, when adding buildings, please do your best to somewhat resemble the shape of the buildings. OSM is not about just adding data, but the data needs to be of acceptable quality.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146869130

You can use "q" to square the buildings. These buildings are likely square/rectangular not these random angles.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146869130

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. These features are still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the features. You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or similar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact. OSM maps the world as it is using aerial imagery and other similarly acceptable sources that are available.

changeset/146886162

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. These features are still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the features. You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or similar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact. OSM maps the world as it is using aerial imagery and other similarly acceptable sources that are available.

changeset/146886162

Has park reopened?

note/3517241

Any update to those discussions?

Please see and respond to note left regarding this C/S.

note/3506634

See note from anonymous:

note/4091423#map=16/37.7641/-122.4351&layers=N

See note from anonymous:

note/4091418