Land covers should not partially overlap. (as you did with the fairways and greens). The areas should either not overlap at all, or the smaller one should be wholly within the larger area.

Additionally, do not "lollipop" areas by creating "holes" with thin extensions to create a fake hole.

I have corrected the errors. Avoid this in the future. Feel free to take a look at the changes to understand how it should be mapped.

Do not add features that partially overlap. This throws error flags. They should either not overlap, or one area should be wholly within the other.

I have resolved this. Please avoid this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141176971

Areas should not be partially overlapping. The smaller area should be fully within the other, or they should not overlap. Partial overlaps generate error flags since the database does not know which is the "top" area.

I have corrected this. Please observe and avoid doing this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141139381

Landcovers should not partially overlap, as you have done with the fairways and golf greens. The smaller area should be fully within the other, OR they should not overlap at all.

I have corrected this to resolve OSM error flags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141112481

Landcovers should not overlap as you have done with the fairways and greens. They ahould either not overlap at all, or one should be drawn completely within the other.

This will need to be addressed as the way it has been done creates an error with the database.

I highly recommend you attempt to fix it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140694977

What does "tarry" mean in your changeset comment? What did you change/alter in this changeset? Please use more detailed changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140695381

What is up with those random grassland areas that you added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140778359

These houses are super poorly drawn. Please take the time to be more accurate in drawing buildings. Additionally, the buildings should be squared using "Q" in the ID editor. Please come back and square these buildings, and make the ones that you mapped as pentagons in this changeset more reflective of their true shape.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140782156

What does "med" mean for your changeset xomment? What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140821360

I was having a hard time validating if it truly does wrap around the south and east side(s) of the house. I will have to take another look when I get home next week.

Thanks.

If the feature exists, they should still be mapped. Unnecessary to some, but not all. There are users mapping mamholes. I say unnecessary, but it actaully exists and can be verified, so it should be mapped (or at least remain).

changeset/140877309

These paths and ways exist based on aerial imagery, and continues to exist.

Just because it is mapped does not mean there there is explicit permission to access or use any of the features. For example, having the house mapped does not give permission for someone to walk into the house.

Restrictions on access shall be posted in accordance with local laws, regardless of what is reflected on the map, present or not.

This edit has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to indicate that the way/path is "private"

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140729693

No, it should be brand:wikipedia=en:T-mobile

Sprint nodes should be renamed or removed and wiki tags need to be changed.

I updated it to have Tmobile tags. T-Mobile bought out Sprint. Sprint stores were either rebranded to T-mobile, or closed. Each location basically has to be checked whether it changed or is no longer there.

In this particular case, it exists as a T-mobile store. It looks like whoever updated the name didn't update the wiki tag. So I just updated the wiki tag on the POI.

changeset/140660588

You also deleted some ways that are DEFINITELY still around and shouldn't have been deleted...

way/569082989

This edit is being partially reverted to readd the bank drivethrough.

Access tags would prevent it from being readded with no access tags (or access such that it allows the public to navigate there).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140596607

'Changeset reverted. Access tags should be used instead, rather than just mass deleting "private" driveways.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
access=*'

changeset/140564523

Why did you delete all these features?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140346599