OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
138165909 over 2 years ago

When creating features, do not "lollipop" the areas. Use multi-relation polygons instead to punch a hole in the area if it is necessary.

109983034 over 2 years ago

reverted.

138156102 over 2 years ago

I have reviewed this changeset.

It shouldn't be a water hazard. I removed that tag from this and the reservoir. This is actually a bit of a messy multi-relation polygon but I cleaned it up a bit.

138167297 over 2 years ago

Why did you get rid of the golf cartpath bridge that is still clearly mapped?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167297

138167720 over 2 years ago

Why did you get rid of the parking lot ways and other features that were already mapped correctly?

Don't delete things that are already correctly mapped. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167720

69385878 over 2 years ago

Despite no changeset comment, can you elaborate on what you did or why? You added tag-less features, such as this:
way/684840860

What is it? Why was it added and why were no tags added?

101061443 over 2 years ago

The paths have once again been removed and left as tag-less lines. The errors are through the roof based on the link you provided:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=416346

There are no paths through the pedestrian areas to provide navigation.

127813200 over 2 years ago

They are all tagless again. It's an absolute mess.

137544374 over 2 years ago

I'm not sure if "Update" is better or worse than "(No comment)"

138095497 over 2 years ago

Please use more descriptive changeset comments. What did you change and why? There have been other users who have commented on your changesets and have requested the same thing.

For more info on how to write changeset comments:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

92318226 over 2 years ago

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

82762882 over 2 years ago

Do not add fictitious features such as:
way/785419440

This changeset has been reverted in part or whole.

59251442 over 2 years ago

Don't outline land areas for the renderer. For example:
way/590860034

This has been resolved.

111839843 over 2 years ago

These shouldn't all be mapped as tiny individual ways. Also, each node doesn't need to have
bicycle_road=yes

I have gone ahead and cleaned it up.

137207769 over 2 years ago

Just FYI, the notes will keep switching off in iD, so you'll have to keep enabling it, but it is a good feature to ask questions for someone else to look at if you aren't sure.

137207769 over 2 years ago

note/3436734

There are a good handful. The note visibility is off by default in the iD editor, but it can easily be enabled. It's under one of the right menus and it is right at the very top.

137986961 over 2 years ago

Don't overlap areas when one ends and the other begins. Specifically, the fairways and the putting greens. They can be connected, but they shouldn't overlap.

137997463 over 2 years ago

Here again with comment regarding the nest of cartpaths that were created. If you are having issues mapping the cartpaths or other features, please, reach out.

137988310 over 2 years ago

What is with all the excess cartpaths at the south end of this path:
way/1186175604/history

I have removed all the excess and cleaned it up.

137989242 over 2 years ago

What the heck is going on at the north end of this way:
way/1186179791/history

https://imgur.com/VE7UR2o

I have gone ahead and cleaned this up. Also added bridges where they were missing.