OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112969735 over 3 years ago

This also added a CeX in a residential area. Seems unlikely.

node/9201209099

121805274 over 3 years ago

I've requested a review, not for the alignment, but for someone to check all the link roads, connections, etc. I don't usually map this stuff so I've no idea if it's right or wrong.

Bing has just been updated to show the new layout.

99230973 over 3 years ago

Yeah, I don't think it should separated, but I don't know enough about lanes, cycle lanes or routing to delete it.

118521964 over 3 years ago

Doubt it. Removed in changeset/119553875

119495871 over 3 years ago

Thanks bro but you're about 9 years to late.

119381866 over 3 years ago

That one does have a name and brand tag. I could do with spending some time on Morrisons Daily though, I think FHRS is unusually up to date on the McColl's -> Morrisons Daily fascia change.

113342544 over 3 years ago

Hey, just seen this.

No, it doesn't look like you added it to the relation in this, but I'm considering deleting the relation, or removing the individual points from the relation. It's not the kind of data OSM usually stores.

118324129 over 3 years ago

I think it i's clearly vegetables, but if you want to change it to sells:vegetables, I wont argue against it.

118324129 over 3 years ago

I think sells:veg is OK tagging, it fits with sells:tobacco and other sells:*. They aren't that popular but it's useful data.

118335522 over 3 years ago

Nice one, fixed the name in #118907705

118129406 over 3 years ago

I've should have cleaned up this changeset in #118775388

118128529 over 3 years ago

Cleaned up in #118774953

109894105 almost 4 years ago

Did you get around to documenting the tags? I have no preference, feel free to update this one.

118129406 almost 4 years ago

node/9556168334

Shouldn't have made it to OSM.

node/9556168333

record_type shouldn't be in OSM.

117122175 almost 4 years ago

This is testing a new MapComplete theme. Don't worry, I'll clean up the data.

116585195 almost 4 years ago

It's a duplicate of disused:shop. I'm trying to stop the build up of shops that shop=shoe & disused:shop=book like this:

node/1977957768

105741063 almost 4 years ago

By chance, the next one I looked at:

node/1977957768

Just looking at the current OSM data there is no way to identify which is correct, is it a disused shoe shop, or a in use book shop.

Looking at the history we can obviously see it's a book shop, but data consumers can't.

105741063 almost 4 years ago

Hey, I don't think you should be adding disused:shop=* and shop=vacant on the same node. Just disused:shop=* is enough.

While both identity an empty store front, having both can lead to shop=* being updated with disused:shop=* not getting removed.

node/1559470913

108480987 almost 4 years ago

Oh yeah, thank you

108480987 almost 4 years ago

Do you know if this is staying closed forever? I heard all the Metros were changing into Express or Superstores