Fixed as you asked for in changeset/158491231
Thanks!

The issue associated with moving the main road toward the shop access road is that it would create an artifical angle which could cause some truck routing softwares to think the turn radius is very large, when it is not. It is preferable to keep the main road angle as close as the real angle as possible. I understand that adding the connection between the main road and the shop access road is artificial too, but it concerns a less important road (the service road). Can you explain how this intersection was tagged as problematic? The service road has the access tag set to "customers", which should make sure routing engines do not use it for through traffic. Please explain which bug/issue this configuration caused exactly in your software suite. Thanks!

Haha! Merci! Good catch!

HI! Please do not add cycling path as separated ways when there is no physical barriers or curb between road and the cycling path. A flex post bollard is not considered a barrier so should be mapped on the road itself. See the cycleway tags on the road way. I will remove the separated way and try to add the info related to the cycling path on the road itself. Thanks!

Excellent merci!

Super pas de problème merci!

Pour quelle raison ce lien cyclable a été retiré? La piste cyclable devient un trottoir à cet endroit et il est interdit aux vélos de circuler sur le trottoir, donc il faut conserver le lien pour que les vélos puissent rejoindre la rue et continuer de rouler dans cette direction. À moins que la ville de Longueuil ait complété la piste cyclable?

Pour quelle raison avez-vous séparé les deux voies? Plusieurs tags de la rue (sidewalks, foot, lanes, maxspeed, etc.) ont été retirés par le fait même. Je vais réparer.

Please do not map temporary construction restrictions. OpenStreetMap is for permanent features and road networks. The rule of thumb is that, for any detour/closure less than one year, you can add a note with dates, but please do not change the network or add blocks because it will likely be forgotten when the construction works will be completed. There are other tools you can use to add construction/traffic and other real-time/temporary layers on top of openstreetmap layers.

Same thing here, a driver coming out of his/her driveway can continue to take the ramp here.

I added it back with restrictions and oneway to make sure routing is not broken here.

Hi! Please explain why you removed this access to the shop? Now a car going from the shop to Chemin Saint-Marie can't reach it and must turn right on Boulevard Saint-Charles and make a large detour, which is not what would happen in real life. Customers can and would continue straight on Chemin Sainte-Marie at the traffic light.

See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement

I agree with most of this. However, you can always use the placement tag to specify how the line is drawn related to the lanes (middle_of/left_of/right_of/transition)

I was having the idea that it was preferable to align roads on the motor_vehicle lanes instead of on the overall center for navigation/routing reasons. Is there a reason to center geographically on the overall width of the street instead?

Thanks! Perfect! I updated the alignement with the new Mapbox aerial photos.

Au procès-verbal du conseil municipal de MHM, on dit sens unique entre Marseille et Jean-Lecompte seulement. J'ai corrigé. Si le sens unique va vraiment jusqu'à Sherbrooke, prière de le mentionner ici.

Ce changement de direction date de quand? Il y a un court tronçon en direction sud suivi du reste en direction nord? Ça me semble bizarre.

Thanks! However, please be aware that an outdoor ice rink is not a building. I will fix that.

Can you explain why you deleted valid addresses there? Thanks!