ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170716488 | 4 months ago | Je ne sais pas... Il faudrait aller vérifier. Je ne prévois pas passer dans ce coin par contre. Vous pouvez mettre un fixme ou une note et poser la question à quelqu'un du coin. :-) |
| 171474277 | 4 months ago | Thanks! Be careful to reconnect entrances to the home buildings though. I fix these. |
| 171379654 | 4 months ago | Bonjour! SVP ne pas réaligner les voies au moyen des vues aériennes de l'éditeur. Ces voies avaient été alignées en utilisant des données des bornes géodésiques officielles du gouvernement du Québec. Je vais les corriger. Il ne faut pas aligner les voies sur des photos aériennes sans vérifier l'offset au préalable. Merci et bonne journée! |
| 171314252 | 4 months ago | bizarre! Alors on garde bicycle=yes |
| 171294979 | 4 months ago | hi! Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find too much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleagues since they may have the same issue. |
| 171301477 | 4 months ago | Hi! Please be careful when you remove crossings or links, because the link you removed at the end of Chemin Bates makes pedestrian routing impossible between Chemin Bates and the sidewalk on Avenue McEachran. I will fix. Thanks! |
| 171296447 | 4 months ago | Hi! Please do not realign nodes as they were aligned using geodesic precise data. The aerial imagery available in most editors is not aligned correctly. Thanks! |
| 171295548 | 4 months ago | Hi! Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find to much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleages since they may have the same issue. |
| 171296383 | 4 months ago | hi! Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find to much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleages since they may have the same issue. |
| 171314252 | 4 months ago | Je me demande si c'est vraiment un mauvais tag... bicycle=dismount sur un traversier, c'est normal non? |
| 171147709 | 5 months ago | OK, perfect! I guess it is temporary. I will put a construction area. |
| 171147709 | 5 months ago | Did you survey the area? It was oneway in 2024. Please confirm that this has ben changed since. |
| 171101324 | 5 months ago | If you see the addresses around this street, their street name is Allée Beaurepaire, so I put that into the official name tag (and name:fr) and put Beaurepaire Drive into name:en |
| 171101324 | 5 months ago | I am waiting for response from MRNF, MAMH and MTMD (three misnitries with a lot of open data on street names and addresses). We need them to accept that we use their data on OSM even if their CC 4.0 licence is not 100% compatible. See this thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403/15 |
| 171089177 | 5 months ago | Also, why remove sidewalk presence tags on service roads? It is perfectly valid and makes routing engine for pedestrian route foot traffic on the sidewalk instead of the road. Thanks! In general, you should not remove tags before asking the previous editor or the community. |
| 171089177 | 5 months ago | When there is a dual carriage we usually count the other direction's sidewalk as present. Otherwise it will be impossible to compare presence of sidewalks on different kind of roads (dual carriage vs single). Please consider the other side sidewalk presence. Thanks! |
| 171101324 | 5 months ago | The alternate names were carefully fetched from different sources and should stay there. beaurepaire alone is not a valid name, it is missing the generic (Rue, Boulevard, Avenue...) |
| 170818547 | 5 months ago | Perfect thanks! |
| 170946318 | 5 months ago | Hi! Please be careful, this edit removed the whole ramp to Boulevard Louis-H.-Lafontaine. Also, there is an unmarked crossing there, since otherwise, it would be impossible to follow the sidewalk on the other side of the road. Unmarked crossing must be added for routing even if there is no marking. Please ask before removing crucial data. |
| 170869117 | 5 months ago | Excellent! Bonne fin de semaine! |