Hi, you deleted a bunch of things from the map in this edit (deleting doesn't just remove them from your edit session, it removes them from the map). I've reversed your changes, all is back as it was.

Found that some of the Mapillary traces are from 2023, and show a new high-kerbed island on the Grove Lane exit, presumably to try to enforce what looks like an annoying and arbitrary L-turn-only out of Grove Lane (down to the big roundabout and back to get to the village!?). Specifically, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=232492605955813
shows the new island, a car crossing into Grove Lane (the left only way added here seems to have been wrong), and (crucially for cycling NW-bound on the cycle route) an exception for cyclists against having to turn left out of Grove Lane. Think I've captured this ok in changeset/137201850
but feel free to tweak if necessary.

Has the designation (recorded in OSM as byway open to all traffic) been formally removed and the way now privately owned? This designation and the multiple references to public right of way in the other tags don't seem consistent with 'permissive'?

Surely this is the vehicle access way to the line of garages, so highway=service was correct as it was? If it's signed as private for motor vehicles, you can put motor_vehicle=private. You can only put what's signed, don't invent restrictions and speed limits.

Please don't realign features to imagery without first aligning that imagery to match the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay available in the iD editor layers tab.

Looking at the website for this site, it is not possible to rent single beds (or even single rooms) but is rented all-or-nothing. It is therefore not a 'hostel' but rather a large OSM 'chalet' as was previously correctly set.
See
tourism=hostel?uselang=en-GB
tourism=chalet?uselang=en-GB
and
tourism=guest_house?uselang=en-GB
Also you set a guest_house tag which is a sub-tag of tourism=guest_house, which this is not (and you did not select either). Reverted.

dragged node of foot bridge reset to original position, your changes visible in: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136912450

The expected public_transport tag for highway=bus_stop node is public_transport=platform. Please see public%20transport=platform?uselang=en-GB
and public%20transport=stop%20area?uselang=en-GB
the latter of which is for use on a stop area relation. There is no public_transport=stop. Repeatedly guessing at tags (eg to try to make iD warnings go away) is not going to help improve the map. I've set public_transport=platform.

As well as dragging the road/path junction node to a wall, you also dragged a ruin node (some distance away) to a river and a solar panel into a field. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136912924
Reverted changeset and reapplied the good change of road type residential to unclassified.
Please review how this happened, for example how you move the map while editting.
Also please always set specific meaningful changeset comments so others know what you intended, eg 'change road type to unclassified' here, so that intended vs unintended changes can be understood if the changeset(s) need to be reviewed.

Noting this was 1st (and only) edit from user, deleted footways, solar panels, landuse etc as well as changing area to motorway road.
All reverted back to how it was.

Looking at the history, seems that the next section further SW was accidentally/ carelessly set as oneway, and recently (19 Apr) fixed:
way/44869219/history
So the routing should get fixed as soon as Plotaroute next update their map data.

Incorrect retagging of clock reverted

Reverted all damage to building shape etc

Reverted. Geometry was fine. Challenge is/was for spiky buildings, not correctly spiky building parts. Look at the imagery before trashing the map.

fiction reverted

I note that at node/87908886 (for example), you have changed the correctly tagged highway=crossing;crossing=traffic_signals to be highway=traffic_signals;traffic_signals=pedestrian_crossing.
According to crossing=traffic_signals and highway=traffic_signals
and common usage, then highway=traffic_signals is used for nodes SEPARATE TO the crossing. I cannot find documentation of your traffic_signals=pedestrian_crossing although there is some localised use of this on the separately mapped lights each side of some crossings. These 5 changesets look like an undiscussed mass edit, please review what you have done and consider reverting.

The give way had the correct orientation and your edit made it wrong.

"1,5" is not a suitable value for lanes

The name tag is for the formal given name of a feature, not a description. The landuse type is also entirely unsuitable.

Also, the bridge used to be correctly mapped and this edit made it wrong