In iD, below the main list of layers there's another list of "Overlay"s, it should be in there (eg 7th of 9 in that list for me). Turning that on should show you blue lines for the land ownership boundaries. Then scroll further down the same panel to the bottom to get a grey box with 2 numbers in the middle. You drag with the mouse on the grey area to move the current imagery (eg Esri/Bing etc) relative to the blue lines. Try to ignore all of the OSM mapped features and anything on the imagery well above ground level, eg if you re-edit here, you'll see a nice rectangle of blue lines matching the low wall around the lighthouse group of buildings. (The more the imagery isn't vertical, ie you can see some of the side walls of buildings, the more careful you have to be to match to ground level features eg the bases of walls.) And ignoring the OSM mapped features takes some practise (in JOSM you can turn off the OSM data while you align but not in iD I think). Hope this helps. Cebderby (Clive)

No response. For reference, changes in this changeset were: Delete 2x stop positions at Selhurst. Delete Blackfriars (Road) former station site node. At Paddington: delete tube and Liz line station nodes merging network+operator into mainline station node, delete 12x stop positions, deleted 1 buffer stop and track at platform 1. At Fort William delete (plat 2) stop position, 'improve' platform shape. Delete stop position at Beasdale.
This is all bad, reverted in ch. 133940494, preserving another user's later changes at Fort William and better platform shape adjustment there.
You need to use meaningful changeset comments and keep your changesets to smaller areas.
And we are still looking for an explanation of the intention of this change.[Google translate of last paragraphs follows:]
Anlamlı değişiklik kümesi yorumları kullanmalı ve değişiklik kümelerinizi daha küçük alanlarda tutmalısınız.
Ve biz hala bu değişikliğin amacına dair bir açıklama arıyoruz.

Given the user added a fictional slip road in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133873232
and that there is no road "A4555" I take this to be more fiction. Also the A5154 in Holyhead should not have been changed to secondary. I am reverting this changeset.

addition of fictional slip road reverted

self_service=no is not credible here, and as as you have added fiction elsewhere, this changeset is reverted

Ryan, looks like https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132030427
included where you were working and will show you the sort of thing that was going on; they put the whole pedestrian area as building=house, deleted the way you had last edited (which my reversion un-deleted), deleted a pedestrian crossing and 2 bus stops. You can put others of their changeset numbers from @Birmingham%20City%20Mission/history in that same tool to see more, but all is repaired. regards Cebderby (Clive)

For clarity, the 5 changesets reverted were all from the user "Birmingham City Mission", who in 90 changesets managed only to correctly move one bus stop node. All the other edits were test saves of fiction, false information added and good tags stripped out, destruction of buildings and roads etc. Have a look through some of their edits for the problem; they now have a 1 year block after failing to respond or change their ways. I have reverted all the damage they did, and am not aware of any edit that you have done. There may be a coincidence of location between their changes and yours.

No response. Continued to edit with same non-beneficial changes: fiction and flawed cleanup, wilful addition of false information, setting recent changes back toward older building uses, layouts, road layouts. Permanent block requested.

Changed map in 2 locations, wrecking recent changes which were up to date back towards old Esri(Clarity) road and building layout, despite referring to Bing imagery which shows the newer layout. Vandalism reverted.

Deliberately false information added to the map in this and last changeset, again, reverted

Deliberate false information added to the map in this and previous changeset reverted.

Badly tagged, and change does not correspond with changeset description - reverted

Deliberately saved fiction and flawed cleanup reverted.

You requested a review:
You can either stop your damaging edits now, or you can have another block put on your account, I will be proposing a permanent block, as out of 79 edits, only 1 had beneficial content, and that had the usual unacceptable changeset comment.
This needs to stop, now.

Hi pe5er. Looks nice, neat and well tagged building and parking. (It's fine to add private parking areas with the access=private as you set). A few thoughts for you. The building should be separate from the entrance way (in iD, select the building, press D or right-click-Disconnect) and a tiny bit further east I think (select the building and press M or right-click-Move and shift a bit right). Also the way to the parking would be best as highway=service. If the 2 paths (end of road and diagonal connection one) allow cycling they can be highway=cycleway (ie foot+cycle), if explicitly not then highway=footway. (If really unclear then leave as highway=path is ok). If you want to confirm the best alignments, you can find out about the OSMUK Cadastral overlay and https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/imagery/ Also note the Bing imagery in iD is pretty old, worth looking at others eg Esri if things may have changed. Happy mapping. Cebderby (Clive)

very badly re-added some (demolished) roads - vandalism reverted

destroyed a mapped crossing and merged a bunch of nodes together - vandalism reverted

added a false primary way right across a mapped junction - vandalism reverted

Morning both.
Would you rather consider using the expected form: highway=construction; construction=residential (or =service as appropriate). No access tags are then needed. See construction=* (and for context) construction=yes

set layer 1 on building previously dragged to bad shape - vandalism/test edit reverted (all other damage also reverted)