The Mica Peak radar was handed over to the FAA in the late 1970s. The military still gets a copy of the radar data, but operation is strictly civilian.

Are you sure it's a military area? I don't recall seeing any military-related warning signs when I surveyed the area, only FAA-related ones. (And I'm certain I didn't see any warning signs outside the fenced area.)

Are you sure it's a military site? I'll have to check my pictures from when I surveyed it, but I don't recall seeing any military-related warning signs, only FAA-related ones (and I'm certain I didn't see any outside the fenced area).

Might want to add a "note=" tag to that effect -- cows don't show up too well in aerial imagery.

A more accurate map is always the preferred option.

The farmland you added doesn't look very farm-like to me, it looks like someone's back yard. Are you sure you tagged it correctly?

Did you forget to change the name?

"Unmaintained track road" is meant for things like logging roads, not unpaved driveways.

Thanks for the addition!

Are you sure the outline covers the entire park? Aerial imagery shows a couple of features to the west that look like they might be part of a playground.

Welcome to OSM!

Since you requested a review, here are the things I noticed:

* First and foremost, your changes are scattered across most of the Americas. This makes it difficult to review, and causes them to show up in the change history for many people. Make sure you save your changes every time you switch areas.
* The commercial building you added in Ely appears to cover between four and seven buildings, none of which looks particularly commercial in aerial imagery.
* The parking lot adjacent to it, on the other hand, looks good.
* If you switch from the default "Bing" imagery to the sharper "Esri Clarity" imagery, the "looks like a dirt road" you added is clearly dirt. Be careful when mapping from Esri Clarity, though, since in addition to usually being the sharpest imagery, it's also usually the oldest.

Would "leisure=fishing" (leisure=fishing) be a reasonable tag for this?

Is there a reason why you deleted surface information from 52 roads here?

As far as I can tell, it's best described as "a weird historical accident". Back in 1888, one developer platted it as an extension of Oak Street, another platted it as an extension of Ash Street, and it never got built. But because the right-of-way provides the only access to a parcel at the south end, the city is required to maintain the potential for building a road there, even if it's only actually used as an informal driveway.

The "rest of the reservation" you added isn't part of the reservation, it's off-reservation trust land (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-reservation_trust_land), which is a very different thing.

The pavement on these streets is brick. I went there and looked.

Is "maxspeed:forward" really the correct tag here? Roads where the speed limit varies with direction are quite rare.

Is the speed limit on WA-261 really 35 mph for the whole distance you've tagged?

You've been making these mistakes every few days for quite a while. Please figure out what you're doing wrong and stop doing it.

Most tools don't care if you spell it "FIXME", "fixme", or "FixMe", they'll alert on any variation of capitalization.

Thanks for helping keep things up-to-date!

A quick request: please don't abbreviate things. It's easy for a computer to create an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but automatically expanding an abbreviation is much harder. For example, should "St." be expanded to "Street", "State", or "Saint"?