Reverted in changeset/116030252

Reverted in 116030227

Reverted in changeset/116030169

Salut, mai este valabilă nota legată de trecerea prin pârâu? Văd că ai marcat drumul drept asfaltat

Hello,
As far as I know the road doesn't have separated carriageway on this segment. Why did you add an additional way for each direction?

I know it simplifies turn restrictions, but this doesn't correctly represent the reality.

Hello, DN7E doesn't exist anymore. I remember when an previous editor removed the ref and reclassified the road to secondary. See the changeset comment for more details: changeset/73359369
Also I recommend using the following site for checking latest data on road classification : http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/247174

Hello, thank you for editing OSM and adding the bike path!
I have modified a few things done by you in this changeset. As the bikepath is part of the road (a lane), instead of drawing a new way glued to the existing road, I have moved all tags from the cycleway onto the road (cycleway:left=lane).
Please read OSM wiki for more details regarding correct tagging : osm.wiki/Bicycle

#112730136

I solved the problem in changeset #112710352

No footway bridge here, it is a disused pipeline

Hello,
What do the points you have added represent?
Please do not add personal markers to the map, those edits are public and points should have meaning for the map.

Hello,
Are there any markings on this route?
I would like to add them to OSM if you have more information.

Hello, the tag you are looking for is ford=yes. Don't hesitate to search on OSM wiki for possible tags: ford=*

Thanks,
I also removed the access=no from the roads in this changeset:
changeset/109933777

If you are interested in what happens in this interchange take a look at the following video: https://youtu.be/ILgbIESuhuk
or at the map in this news article:
https://www.ziuacargo.ro/stiri/solutie-pentru-fluidizarea-traficului-in-nodul-rutier-de-la-margina-187663.html/

In this changeset you have added access=no and highway=construction on some segments on the highway exit. Also you have deleted the u-turn segment.
This was correct according to the old configuration of the roads, but is not actual anymore.

Hello,
There is a recent temporary solution put in place where traffic can enter the highway on the opposite side and turn around after a few metres. Why did you delete those roads?

Please do not merge roads using iD editor, it tends to damage relations without it warning you

I initially named it "Drumul expres" as this was the name used by the authorities and in the press (the name "drumul rapid" or "drumul expres" referred initially to the new road behind the railway station and then it was applied also to the extensions - new roads towards Calea Clujului and new road towards DN19). It was never an official name, but it stuck locally and with the officials.
Around the time time last part opened there started news regarding the Oradea-Arad highway/expressway and to avoid confusion between the projects RobertH-PUM suggested to call it Centura "Drumul expres".
I suggest looking over this forum post at what was disscused in the first half of 2020, when this road opened - https://forum.peundemerg.ro/index.php?topic=904.90

Historically the street has been marked on maps with Strada Bihorului toward Paleu up to the exit out of Oradea because this was the natural continuation of the street. The road towards Real/Remarkt is the new variant and I think it is weird for the name of the street to move from it's former location just because this new road seems to be the more direct route nowadays. Regarding houses, neither does the new road have any houses on it and will probably never have.

I suggest either not naming any of the roads Strada Bihorului, either keeping Strada Bihorului on the old road.

How come Calea Bihorului moved from the road to Paleu to the new variant road?