Hello, I think this node has a bad location, can you take a look what happened with it's coordinates? node/8727837488

Hey Adi,

You are correct that E70 still follows DN6.
But there is an somehow unwritten rule in which european roads doubled by a motorway are tagged only with primary and not trunk.

I know it sounds subjective, but this is the case in the entire country.
The logic is that highway=* refers to road importance for traffic and this road no longer has much importance for traffic that isn't local. Practically the road hierarchy defined by the official road classification is just a guideline and you can see everywhere exceptions to the rule.

Nu mai există Consulatul Onorific? Pe MAE încă apare, face parte din biroul Carpatair.
https://www.mae.ro/foreign-missions/3657

Hello Armin, the intersection is weirder than that, that's why I didn't bother to separate when I edited in the area. Please see a schematic of how traffic flows in this link: https://imgur.com/a/VEXUgBu
The road south of the grass separator is not oneway, but I have no idea how to correctly represent it on OSM.

Hello Mihai, what is the source of those changes? I find it weird that the bars have people names and the "Vinăria Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej" is a really peculiar name for a winery. Unfortunately I cannot find any information about it on the internet, which I would have thought that I would have due to it's weird name and it's size (there is another one with the same name added also by you in Cluj)

Please do not tag everything as building, you have retagged a lake, two industrial courts and afuel station parking as buildings. Why?

Hello, you have deleted a new building. Please use Maxar imagery; it is newer than Bing

Please do not delete address points. This is very important information for data consumers.

Salut, te rog să ai grijă când muți harta căci poți trage puncte. În această editare ai modificat foarte multe drumuri din centrul Timișoarei și din Dumbrăvița. Am să-ți fac revert la changeset căci ar fi foarte greu să repar fiecare drum distrus.

This discussion is going nowhere. Please make your statement on the talk-ro mail list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro) and I willl also make mine and let the community decide.

Nicio problemă, baftă în continuare la treabă, am văzut că ați adăugat destul de multe clădiri. Dar încercați să țineți pentru voi împărțirea internă a proiectului. Este o platfrormă publică și astfel de informații nu au ce căuta.

There are a lot of roads which do not have DN number format (actually most beltways), for example DNCALB DNCORA, DNVO1K, DNVTM. Just because you didn't encounter them it doesn't mean they do not exist.
Please, show me proof that DN1N variant is the correct designation if you insist that my official documents are false and no, Google Maps is not proof.

You have edited relation #12227641 in this changeset. This relation was the huge meadow between Feleacu and the Vâlcele-Apahida road. You have edited it to be a dovecoat building. (look at object's history: relation/12227641/history )
Nevermind, it has been corrected by another user in the meantime. Pardon my observation. I was just trying to inform you.

I wouldn't have to be combatative if I wouldn't have to always explain to people that it is illegal to copy from Google Maps and that if their mistake became the name that most people use, it still doesn't become truth. I have showed you official documents and asked you to look at road markers for the correct information and you will see that it is indeed DNVOCE.

Well, then modify the construction site, not the entire meadow.

Wikipedia is for sure not a valid source, the article was made by people having the same assumption as you, that the information in Google Maps is correct. Look over the document better, VOCE is not the local use abbreviation, it is in the "variante ocolitoare" subcategory of DNs (DNVOCE is it's only classification)
Just take a road trip and look what is written on the road markers. DN1N exists fictionally, as it the former part of DJ105S that was taken over during the construction of the road. But the entirety of it is marked as known as DNVOCE/VOCE/Varianta Cluj-Est everywhere in the official documents.

Hello, thank you for correcting the Taco Bell mistake, but can you add back the deleted tags (mall specific tags, mall name) ? This is also the case at the other buildings you have edited.

Hello, apart from the road name problem I wrote about in a previous changeset, you have modified a huge meadow into a building in this changeset, this is certainly incorrect

Hello, if you live nearby then point me to where it is marked as DN1N, last time when I checked the km markers (borne kilometrice) say "Varianta de Ocolire Cluj Est (shorted as DNVOCE), there is no evidence of DN1N. Also in law (HG 540/22.06.2000) is also marked ad "VOCE"

Hello, if you live nearby then point me to where it is marked as DN1N, last time when I checked the km markers (borne kilometrice) say "Varianta de Ocolire Cluj Est (shorted as DNVOCE), there is no evidence of DN1N. Also in law (HG 540/22.06.2000) is also marked ad "VOCE"