Branko Kokanovic's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 132206522 | almost 3 years ago | prema belesci note/3546647 |
| 131812184 | almost 3 years ago | Nemam neki razlog. Ima u GTFS-u još raznih grešaka i čudnih skraćenica, a i ja sam ispravljao njihove greške takođe. Samo na liniji 64 ima 3 greske u nazivima stanica (Ilidenska bez N, Veljka Dugosevica se zove drugacije u različitim smerovima, i Losnjnska Donja). Ti ako vidiš još nešto, ispravi! Imaš i ovaj PTNA za brzi pogled. |
| 131853341 | almost 3 years ago | You also changed border here (as well as changeset/131853138#map=18/42.31903/22.34351), can I ask you to stop what you are doing and sync with me. We need to have common borders from open data (or have different borders if we disagree a lot), but let's start by showing me what is source of your data? Thanks |
| 131853138 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, I noticed you moved border just slightly, to include one peak in it - this one: node/6018346975. Can I ask where you found data for this? Maybe we should just move peak to be part of old position of border. These border came from open data from Serbia government and we imported them couple of years ago and we monitor them daily (hence how we noticed this). If Macedonia have some open data, we can share them and see where we differ?! If you are OK with it and there is no open data, I would move border where it was together with peak (it is 10m difference).
|
| 131812184 | almost 3 years ago | E, nije ovo typo nikakav. Sva stajalista su uneta kao sto je prema zvanicnom sajtu i GTFS-u. Ovde mozes da vidis sadrzaj GTFS-a: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/index.php kao i na bgprevoz.rs. Trudimo se da ostavimo imena stajalista kao sto su napisana i kao sto su u ovom open data setu. Popravicu ja ovo, ali ako mislis da treba da budu drugacije napisani, bolje da pokrenemo temu na forumu. Meni je i ovako OK, ali onda gubimo automatizaciju koja svaki dan proverava ceo GTFS (tako sam i primetio ovo) |
| 131784238 | almost 3 years ago | E, samo jedna molba - ako mozes da ne spajas landuse (niti bilo sta drugo) za administrativne granice (one plave linije). To su odvojene stvari, jedno je fizicka stvar, a ovo drugo je definisano zakonom i, iako se nekad poklapaju, losa je praksa da budu vezani. Molim te samo pazi. Za administrativne granice imamo i dnevne provere za kvalitet, tako da tako i znamo da su se pomerile. Hvala! |
| 131577012 | almost 3 years ago | obicno koristimo cirilicu na OSM-u. Razlog je sto je konverzija cirilica -> latinica jednoznacna, a obrnuto nije (npr. zamisli da je prebacuje "IX gimnazija", "Microsoft kancelarija" ili neka madjarska ulica, pa to bi bilo "ИЏ гиманзија", "Мицрософт канцеларија" i sl.). Posto planiramo da imamo latinicnu mapu uskoro, onda je cirilica jedno od pravila za mapu. Ako stignes, izmeni. Ako ne, nema veze, neko ce vec. Bolje da ima i na latinici, nego da nema uopste:) |
| 131468728 | almost 3 years ago | These are not duplicated boundaries, it is per official cadastre. Please don't deduplicate them:) I will revert this one |
| 74489968 | almost 3 years ago | potrgane linije 607, 611 i 711, ispravljeno u changeset/131279345 |
| 130210346 | about 3 years ago | Ako si ovo vec uradio, izmeni osm.wiki/Beograd/Javni_prevoz da ubacis ove tagove |
| 123016680 | about 3 years ago | Lokalni nivo je najbolji nivo, to OSM-u treba najviše! - lokalci koji menjaju stvari lokalno, one koje znaju!:) Ako ti treba neka pomoć, savet... cimaj na PM, imamo i forum na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 i telegram grupu na https://t.me/osm_sr. Prošao sam prošle godine bajsom kroz Lučane, na putu ka Ovčaru, tako da ne znam koliko da tebi budem zahvalan što je ruta radila, ali hvala svakako:) |
| 129956529 | about 3 years ago | 👌 |
| 107360176 | about 3 years ago | Evo query da se vidi šta je na latinici od ulica: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oNO. Ne liči mi da će biti teško proći ovo, ne znam jel ću ja stići da radim, ali nadam se da sam pomogao i ovako:) |
| 129534941 | about 3 years ago | Removed name:en in changeset/129716901. Please if you do any big changes or anything involving automated tooling, please contact us on https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 or at least on Telegram at https://t.me/osm_sr |
| 107360176 | about 3 years ago | Gledam Kursumliju, rekoh ko je dodao ove ulice sa osisanom latinicom i vidim tebe u ovom changesetu, rekao bih sa "pocetka karijere":) Razmisli da ih popravis, sa ovim iskustvom:) Ili ako hoces, nije ni meni problem, ali ne bih da ti diram u tvoju tvorevinu bez pitanja:) |
| 129534941 | about 3 years ago | Please reply here before we go in process of reverting. It might take us days to fix everything. You might be able to help us with your tooling. |
| 129534941 | about 3 years ago | plus you vandalized "name:en" in bus names, like node/1331577993. This is very unfortunate |
| 129534941 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I will revert this change. We adhere to PT v2 schema and we don't use "stop" role members, only "platform". I understand that you are just trying to be helpful, but this will require changing our automation (which we use to let us know about new GTFS releases or regressions like this) to "know" about stop positions too, and if you are really, really into adding stop positions, you should probably start topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 |
| 129480833 | about 3 years ago | Ops, I see now you are not native speaker, let me rephrase: great you added this line, look at PTNA for more details: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/trips.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&route_id=10029. What I noticed could be better is: "gtfs:agency_id", "colour" nije dobar, "gtfs:trip_id:sample" and "gtfs:shape_id". Regarding bus stations, looks like they differ compared to bgprevoz.rs/PTNA. Do you have better insight, or we should go with official GTFS data? Also, let me know if you would like to change it, or I can, I am OK with both:) |
| 129480833 | about 3 years ago | Super sto si dodao ovu liniju. Pogledaj u PTNA kako izgleda linija za detalje: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/trips.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&route_id=10029. Ono sto sam ja primetio je da jos moze da se doda je: "gtfs:agency_id", "colour" nije dobar, "gtfs:trip_id:sample" i "gtfs:shape_id". Sto se tice stanica, kao da se razlikuju u odnosu na zvanicne (bgprevoz.rs) tj. PTNA podatke i ovo sto je dodato. Jel znas detaljnije nesto o tome (mozda da koristimo GTFS zvanicne podatke ako za ovo nisi siguran)? Javi da li bi ti ovo da promenis ili hoces ja, meni je svejedno:) |