reverted, as previously explained - please contact community

reverted, as previously explained - please contact community

reverted, as previously explained - please contact community

reverted, as previously explained - please contact community

Zdravo, RGZ i adresni registar kazu da ovde ima dosta ulaza i da zgrada nije samo 51 i 51b, vec ima dosta vise ulaza i lokala. Molim te nemoj da brises 51a-51l ulaze, nego ako vec imas lokalno znanje, postavi ulaze bolje nego sto ih postavim ja na osnovu RGZ-a. Za vise detalja, pogledaj https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uvoz-adresnog-registra-plan/8916 i https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ platformu. Pitaj slobodno ovde ili na PM sve sto te zanima!

Zdravo,
Ovde si promenio 24i na 24 za ovu pekaru, ali mislim da je ovo bolje ostaviti po RGZ-u, tj. 24i jer je 24 malo severnije. RGZ detalje mozes da vidis na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ar/index.html, a iD editor ima i transparentnu nasu podlogu sa adresama. Cimaj ako treba jos detalja!

Zdravo,
zamenio sam ovde brojeve 41 i 41a prema onome sto si ti naveo. Changeset: changeset/160410048 ili https://osmcha.org/changesets/160410048

Pogledaj da li je OK. RGZ kaze je obrnuto (pogledaj https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ar/index.html), ali verovacu tebi ovde

što disused? Sad je upravo prošao tramvaj 9 pored mene? Treba mu samo promeniti geometriju i možda ga preimenovati u 9L (mada na tramvajima i dalje piše 9)

reverted
Please contact community over forum or on Telegram, what you are doing is not acceptable
---
obrisano
Kontaktiraj zajednicu na forumu ili na Telegramu, ovo što radiš nije prihvatljivo

no worries, feel free to delete if you see fit (I might bring back those addresses as demolished to make report better:D), you are doing awesome work - new roundabout is more important than demolished building:) Thanks!

Any reason why you are deleting addresses in this region? Our real-time https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/index.html address report showed that you deleted 13 addresses? What imagery you used, since I don't see new roundabout on Bing imagery? Consider using lifecycle prefix for demolished buildings (demolished:building=yes) instead of removing (but I would like to see imagery you are using to confirm)

reverting as this is clearly error and since user is not reacting to us reaching to them, and continues to do it - I would say vandalism. There is no bicycle path, I took a street view today from this whole street:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stalker314314?lat=44.80758398820771&lng=20.48528435150945&z=17&pKey=1122251479622733&x=0.49231184075293705&y=0.4697372373598826&zoom=0&focus=photo

reverted

Mozda treba ovo da prodiskutujemo na forumu? Za hotel (meni licno) je ok da sklanjamo, ali ne znam da li bas treba za sve da sklanjamo? Npr. ja cesto stavim "Pekara X" ili tako nesto. Sama cinjenica da su ljudi navodili "hotel" u imenu mi govori da ima "popular vote", pa mozda neko ne bi bio srecan sa ovim sto radis?

You are already warned not to add non-exististent footways between graveyards and yet you continue to do that. Since you are reading this messages (we know as you are replying to some), I assume you decided to ignore them without answering. I removed all footways from Lesce that you added.
---
Vec smo ti rekli da ne dodajes pesacke staze na groblja, ali ti nastavljas da to radis, iako ocigledno citas poruke (jer odgovaras na njih). Pretpostavicu da si odlucio da ih ignorises bez da odgovaras na njih, pa cu obrisati sve staze sa Lesca koje si dodao.

please stop mapping footways between graveyards. This is not acceptable level of mapping in OSM.

please stop mapping footways between graveyards. This is not acceptable level of mapping in OSM.

please stop mapping footways between graveyards. This is not acceptable level of mapping in OSM.

please stop mapping footways between graveyards. This is not acceptable level of mapping in OSM.

This is better set of changes, but please write meaningful comments.
---
Ovo su ok izmene, ali molim te piši smislenije komentare