lol! Definitely not a forest of palm trees in Scotland. I've fixed this. Thanks for this amusing bit of attribute analysis.

Excellent edit, thanks for finding this interesting data source.

Oops, that was definitely an error on my part. Should have been access=private. I've fixed it now. Thanks for spotting.

Based on publicly available aerial photography of the site in April 2025. Progress seems to be happening quickly with the construction compound.

"a" ?!?

Oh dear, you're right. How did that happen?!? I'll make sure it is fixed.

Oops, that was definitely me, and extremely clumsy. Terribly sorry and thanks for your quick fix.

Yes, I don't think I did that attachment at all correctly here. Thanks for fixing.

Oops, first times I'd tried to tag one of those. Fixed. Thanks for the advice!

Oh dear, you're right. I've adjusted it to the correct ref now. Thanks for checking!

Oops, thanks for fixing my mistaken tags there.

Not sure it was you, the houses along the Charlottes expanded their back gardens a while ago by taking over a strip of the field. This can be seen in the Cadastral overlay. Looks like the location of the footpath was actually changed at this time near to the pub.

Yep, thanks for pointing out that note. Following a rulemaking exercise under sections 48A and 80A of the Communications Act by Ofcom in 2019, Openreach are indeed responsible for all telephone exchange buildings in the country. This was done so that BT could not avoid the regulatory requirements of the Communications Act. I'll reply to it.

Yep, oops. Have mostly used iD up until now, but trying very hard to get on with JOSM. Always did the Cadastral alignment bit with iD, but hadn't thought to do it with JOSM. Will do that in future. Thanks for fixing my clumsy edit.

Sounds like a good plan - I'll do exactly that. I've also found many boxes where the ref code doesn't really match with the website.

Hey Dan, you're right, I made a bit of a muddle of that edit. I've adjusted it so it should be correct now. Thanks for the review.