OpenStreetMap
Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 56924315 | almost 8 years ago | Be sure to remove source:maxspeed when removing the default city speed limit. lanes should also include lanes:forward and lanes:backward when possible.
|
| 56920617 | almost 8 years ago | Isn't Panera more of a fast food place?
|
| 56808304 | almost 8 years ago | It's been about a year since I mapped that while I was walking down from my office if the time to find some breakfast. Can't say Im a fan of Hurts Donut after that. |
| 56808429 | almost 8 years ago | I fixed phone and addr:street on this to meet standard OSM conventions.
|
| 56808304 | almost 8 years ago | The D should have been moved to addr:unit=*, but I'm afraid I'm a little confused on how name:it=* comes into play on this particular gelateria.
|
| 56759999 | almost 8 years ago | Also, I hope I don't come across as a giant hardass going through the reviews! |
| 56759999 | almost 8 years ago | Thanks! I merged it into the building you drew. |
| 56800395 | almost 8 years ago | name=* should be the main name. oneway=yes doesn't quite make sense on the other way. I can get this fixed up, but can you clarify what was meant here so I have it clear?
|
| 56766940 | almost 8 years ago | No abbreviations in addresses.
|
| 56760404 | almost 8 years ago | phone=*#Usage
|
| 56759999 | almost 8 years ago | This looks like a tractor dealership on Digital Globe Premium, which was taken sometime around this last December.
|
| 46884333 | almost 8 years ago | Reservoirs are not ponds. Names highly unlikely outside a theme park.
|
| 45535214 | almost 8 years ago | pools are not lakes.
|
| 45535188 | almost 8 years ago | No evidence that these features exist.
|
| 45535113 | almost 8 years ago | No evidence that a path ever existed along the roads appears to exist.
|
| 45534326 | almost 8 years ago | Turning circle would be more appropriate than making a loop at the end of a way.
|
| 56539662 | almost 8 years ago | Also, yeah, I'd fully agree that Texas makes for especially odd classification owing to it's huge number of auxiliary routes, of various and often nebulous significance, such as, despite signage, there is only one Ranch Road (RM 1), and *all* of the rest are properly FMs, and while the FMs are generally more important than the single Ranch Road, and those are more signifcant than Rec Roads and Park Roads, how do those two compare? Similarly, Loop and Spur? It's a hot mess down there, even before trying to figuring out how to squish that into unclassified/tertiary/secondary/primary while lacking quaternary, quinternary... |
| 56539662 | almost 8 years ago | RIght, generally a good idea to weight the local functionality with the classification to kind of rank it out. Like a major thoroughfare through a city (like, say, FM 2786 or CR 150 in Allen) might be underrated even as a secondary. But, say, FM 1885 or FM 920, northwest of Weatherford? Yeah, that's a pretty solid argument for a tertiary. Let's look at TX 183 in Dallas. Yeah, that's solidly a primary. Long Avenue just north of that, it's kind of an iffy judgement call on secondary or primary given that it's clearly built to be a major boulevard, but at least on the bing imagery, yeah, not seeing much of anything there trafficwise. Basically, the idea of US being primary, the highest level of state roads being secondary, and auxillary state, county and city roads would be a safe rule of thumb. Going higher or lower definitely suggests that they're operating "out of their usual league" to the average viewer, so to speak. Regionally local to me, OK 66 (given it's overlap with US Historic 66), OK 117 (given it's large size), hit higher than base level. But not OK 11 between Skiatook and Pawhuska, even though that's the main way to get between Tulsa and the Osage Nation capitol, because there's not really anything else that differentiates it at all from any other state highway twisting through (and if I wanted to stick to more major highways, say, because it's icy and I want to stick to what's the least likely to get me killed while driving a moving truck with everything I own in it, I might zoom out a bit and see US 75 and US 60 instead, or if I'm feeling more adventurous and can reliably count on being able to self-rescue (or at least have AAA find me), I might pull a detour on CR 2561 through Nelagoney or bypass unexpected construction on US 60 by rat-running CR 2732). Cultural significance can play a role, too, for example, Historic US 66 tends to still warrant a higher rating because of its continued significance and impact today, even if it's largely been bypassed and obsoleted by I 10, 15, 40, 44 and 55. |
| 56617866 | almost 8 years ago | RIght, without an island, that's a turning circle. With an island, you mapped it correctly. Looking at the aerial photography (Bing and DigitalGlobe), it looks like a turning circle. |
| 56617866 | almost 8 years ago | This looks more like a highway=turning_circle than a loop.
|