Seems like you upgraded several obviously primary sections to trunk...could you please not do that? Trunk is for expressways, primary for major undivided unlimited roads.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109489043

Curious how this ended up being a globe-spanning edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109521028

Please don't abbreviate in names. Computers are real good at creating abbreviations on the fly when desirable but are bad at expanding them because of the potential for ambiguity.

osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109523788

This does appear to actually be a rural farmhouse driveway.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109441258

Did this recently get lane markings? If not, then lane_markings=no is better than lanes=2 in this case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109219049

OK. Probably actually a cycleway if it has lanes.

This is clearly a bad edit. I 40 is not the name of this road, it's the ref, and it was already tagged. The name is signed regularly along this section and the source:name=* tag clearly indicates when it was renamed. See also osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Also was this surveyed as having actually been changed on these segments for the speed limit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109161511

Is this a path, or is it the sidewalk to Sand Springs Park Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109205754

A school parking lot and driveway is "residential" now?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108774289

Uuuh, where's the ford? Did you just join these two objects without looking? Kinda looks more like a culvert just a few meters north...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108515093

name=* should be in proper case with no abbreviations.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108263051

Mapping street-side sidewalks with the name of the street is generally considered wise.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108052035

Should be "Cache Road Northwest". Please don't abbreviate in name=*.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108066048

They're not the kind that drop into a hole and get padlocked down?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108211602

Yeah, no, Exchange doesn't connect through anymore, hasn't in years.

Looks like some of these intersections may be bridges? Could you tag where the bridges are?

What is this supposed to be?

Don't sweat the rendering, as you can see from the layers box on the OSM site, there's six right there that all interpret the data differently. Let the renderer worry about how it looks, focus on what's actually correct.

The west lot at 410 and the lot in front of 420 and 520 don't really make sense to be mapped as two different polygons. The east lot at 410 probably shouldn't be attached to the road centerline for maintainability and continue to the edge of the lot instead of the aisle centerline.

area=yes won't change it if it's not already rendering leisure=park. Consult your renderer's documentation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106929708

it's redundant to the highway classification in this case.