Isn't 44 through Lawton toll-free?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110509622

If it weren't a paid mapper, I would agree. For a paid mapper, c'mon man, spend the time to not slapdash through it and go for precision.

Really expecting a way higher attention to detail from paid mappers here.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109843870

Took a while to figure out what was going on here...maybe go for one airport at at time so it's easier to QA, please.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109366818

When bringing in buildings, it's generally expected you adjust the corners to match what's actually on the ground, not just import from MapWithAI.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109762582

Oh no problem! I definitely could have used the help when I was new and the map desperately needs someone actually local to metro OKC to help on that end.

landuse=retail is what you were looking for.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109642515

No problem! Glad to help!

Kinda sorta, on the stuff around OKC that is already tagged 25 MPH, you may need to remove or change source:maxspeed as most of the 25 MPH roads are tagged based on OKC's citywide speed limit.

It'll be in the tags after the fields section in the id editor that comes up by default if you're on the website.

Be sure to update source:maxspeed if changing maxspeed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109629065

Awesome. Just making sure because we don't have great imagery for the area and there's different tagging for roads that don't have marked lanes.

The US in general suffers from upward classification creep in general, but Texas definitely has a pretty severe case of it. Good rule of thumb is if there's multiple possible classifications, the safest bet is the lowest sensible option. Most people and routers don't really care about nitpicking at the low end, but on long distances, how the high end gets classified matters quite a bit for more rapid elimination of lower quality routes.

US would be primary, the main state highways would be secondary and secondary state highways tertiary.

Glad to see that place is still doing OK after Oklacon ended; seemed like a lot of stuff was dependent on the convention happening every year to put them in the black for the year.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109367977

Is this marked as two lanes, or is it unmarked?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109351633

This one's good-ish. Adjusting corners to line up would be ideal when using RapID to pull in building outlines, since it's often a little off.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109544106

Spur 30 is one of the Texas secondary highways, which is third level. It's not a particularly well travelled route, so I don't really think upgrading it was particularly warranted. In general if there's two highway=* values that could apply, the lower of the two is probably the better option.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109548272

Nice catch, looks like the old rule cited (and looks like bicycle:source can now be removed) was repealed on August 9, 2019 and now points to a newly renumbered code preventing lane splitting.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109108889

Assuming this is a detached single family home, then building=detached would be the most specific tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109486760