Tamarack Creek feeds and drains Lake Hanel.

There's also a small creek (I'd label it as a drain) that I know is Wolf Run Ditch, flowing easterly and intermittently, somewhere between the 44 and the southern boundary of the camp that I can't make out (probably more recognizable if we ever get some spring imagery).

Lake Hanel, is, however, correctly named on the map.

Looking at my old Scout book, what's on the map right now, and DigitalGlobe, it looks like taxlot 2S 11E 0 300 is within the camp boundary with recognizable features including at least two troop camp sites, the horsemanship area, and corral area are on that taxlot.

If you want to get extra detailed, the camp can be divided at FS 44, with the section south of 44 being Old Camp Baldwin (disused since it burned down in a circa 1955 forest fire, only concrete foundations left as evidence that it was ever a permanent camp) which is still used for some low-level treks from the main camp north, which contains a small lake within the southeast corner that, going from a roughly 20 year old memory is named Lake Ramsey, but I can't reliably recall the name for sure. I don't think the dam on "Lake Ramsey" is still recognizable as such given it was in a severely damaged and very neglected state last time I stood on it in 2001.

Any objection to me updating it a little bit to match local knowledge I have on that one?

Did Camp Baldwin really shrink? Last I checked, they still had a rather rectangular plot up there.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65254595 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.

Close. Southernmost building there looksl ike you included a parkign lot within the building, the next one north looks like it's smaller than what it appears in the aerials. Zooming in slightly more can help with fine detail precision in iD.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65251897

Where are you getting maxspeed from? Is this posted? If there's no statutory or posted speed limit, then maxspeed is not applicable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65219938

Check your edit descriptions, please.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65217328

This should probably be highway=service, service=driveway in this case, since it's a flaglot driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65210762

That landuse=residential would be better tagged as place=neighborhood.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65052625

You're allowed to park in front of the fire station?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65056876

Doesn't look like this has a name; name should only be the name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65056827

Take it to the mailing list, the comments in the changeset are counter to the majority where these things are discussed.

addr:street= must not contain abbrevations. This is an obviously bad edit.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65042699

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65032395 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed smash-tagging, please see [email protected]

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65032402 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed smash-tagging, please see [email protected]

> There is no difference in the Tisdale immediately north vs. immediately south of the Apache St interchange. If I get on the Tisdale heading south from 36th St, the Apache interchange means nothing to me. The jump in road quality (and speed limit, for that matter) happens immediately after the Gilcrease intersection, so that's where the classification change should be.

I disagree. Freeways (motorways) do not have at grade intersections. Trunks are very nearly freeways in that they can.

> I-93 through Franconia Notch (a super two) is in OSM as a motorway. Ditto the super two section of MA 2 and the UNDIVIDED super-two section of NY 85. So no, motorways do NOT have to be dual carriageways.

I'd say those are tagged incorrectly.