It looks like this actually is a track.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384496

Dirt cycleways are rather not typical, but a dirt path would be more likely, with bicycle=* and foot=* tags as appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384338

Is access=destination correct? That would make sense if "No through traffic" is posted. Also looks like it's correct to have it as a track on the one you changed to footway. Maybe highway=path, but looks like it's suitable for getting a truck down it to maintain the place. So motor_vehicle=no might be better if cars aren't generally allowed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384220

Looks like the driveways along the northeast side of Fort Sill might need a closer look. I'm trying to untangle it now, but looks like you connected them to the Fort Sill boundary line instead of the road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58355845

OK, uploading another changeset right now for Bella Vista Bypass.

No problem, I'm working from DG Premium then, and aligning it to the GPS traces available.

Sounds good, I'm looking on DigitalGlobe Premium; is that still accurate imagery for the route?

Crystal Beach Park is already mapped, plus keep in mind proper capitalization and spelling counts, as do putting the tags on the outline object. Please avoid attaching area outlines to road centerlines.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58299316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/58250093 where the changeset comment is: I'm reasonably certain I did not hallucinate seeing this school when I passed it earlier this week.

When moving to ref, try CR N0830 instead of verbatim from name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58232454

Diagonally across a field?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58232561

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/58249963 where the changeset comment is: Reverting imported data.

While the address data may be good, it appears this data may be sourced from a georeferencer that may be using copyrighted data. Additionally, the other data in this appears to be meant for a personal map layer, not for the general consumption of the map. Please consider using Leaflet to project your data over OpenStreetMap, as adding this kind of data to the live database will not produce the results you intended, and will cause problems for other OpenStreetMap data consumers.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58217698

Buildings with holes should be mapped as multipolygons.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58178633

I'm not opposed to landuse=highway, and I'm on the fence about landuse versus landcover for grass. Though for forests, landuse versus landcover, while they may be congruent, can be very different things, for example, when the grove of trees is for forestry products, something that came up a lot when I was in Salem, Oregon thanks to the surrounding environs. Likewise, with the next county over from that producing the majority of the world's grass seed and sod, there's huge farms that are basically giant lawns because the crop is literally lawn grass.

Well, the landuse would be more like highway, since it's a highway infield, but the land cover is grass.

No problem. It doesn't have to be cadastre perfect (that's not exactly feasible given that often corner monuments end up in publicly inaccessible areas on the back sides of rows of abutting lots, if there's any at all) but what can be discerned from the aerial is often considered "good enough" where boots-on-the-ground surveys can't be taken.

Is there any disagreement on my assessment of Bella Vista? If not, I'll pick over it and make the change.

Oh no problem, didn't accuse you of otherwise. Just happened to notice the changeset because of whatever was done over towards Grove and Jay.

I am using PT Assistant, but it's not really much help versus doing it by hand. MTTA's GTFS feed is, to put it __very__ politely, a hot mess, like Apple Maps bad. Stops inside office blocks, routes turning impossibly from surface streets directly onto freeways...if there's a way to screw up the data badly, they've done it.