Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 58448401 | over 7 years ago | Is it not Leaning Elms Park? Looking at Claremore's website, that seems to be the only park on Muskogee Avenue. |
| 58459353 | over 7 years ago | Thanks! |
| 58459627 | over 7 years ago | OK, doesn't count as a footway, then.
|
| 58459234 | over 7 years ago | OK, so perhaps not entirely terrible, but if they're not named, leave the name off. If they're not open to the public, access=private may be a good idea.
|
| 58459353 | over 7 years ago | OK. Might doublecheck the geometry, one of your new footways is in a wall.
|
| 58459627 | over 7 years ago | Was this sidewalk recently built? I'm not seeing any evidence of it on DigitalGlobe, Bing, or Esri imagery.
|
| 58459353 | over 7 years ago | Is that sidewalk really running all the way around that building, and the other into a wall?
|
| 58459234 | over 7 years ago | Are all of these footways called Mallory Path? Seems a little unlikely.
|
| 58448401 | over 7 years ago | Is this really the name of this park?
|
| 58427557 | over 7 years ago | Enough to tell what was going on, I've edited this spot again in an guess on what you were going for.
|
| 58416919 | over 7 years ago | Is that object with the odd geometry a park or a playground, by 177th and Silvehawk? While not impossible that it's also a park, it definitely looks like a playground, but in either case could use a little refinement on the shape. Is the pond at 178th and Silvehawk new?
|
| 58416460 | over 7 years ago | Same as previous changeset regarding footway vs path.
|
| 58412991 | over 7 years ago | Little hard to tell from aerial imagery and I'm not super familiar with the area, but highway=footway is something that implies it's either a sidewalk or has no bicycle access. If bicycles are allowed and it's not a sidewalk, it's probably a path.
|
| 58412506 | over 7 years ago | Wow, swing and a hit there! Off to a good start!
|
| 58385494 | over 7 years ago | That would be a path. |
| 58384496 | over 7 years ago | Right, a path would be most appropriate versus footway, which is geared only to pedestrians (or might be open to bikes but isn't designed to handle any real volume of bikes). |
| 58387880 | over 7 years ago | name=* should only be the name.
|
| 58386279 | over 7 years ago | It doesn't look like any lanes are marked on Wireless Way, only ways with marked lanes get lanes tags.
|
| 58385494 | over 7 years ago | This definitely looks like a concrete bridge on the aerial, and definitely not a footway.
|
| 58384525 | over 7 years ago | I can see signage for cyclists in the shadows, this is definitely not a footway.
|