Hi, Quite a few problems including duplicated sections of highway and several highways joined to area outlines. I think I've fixed them all.

Regards Bernard.

Several amendments.

Hi, the correct tags were on the POI, I've moved them to the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags here, 18 Sadler Close is not the house name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've somehow got the wrong place. You placed the shop POI in Cambridge UK.

Could you please amend the location, if you need help please just comment here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made some amendments to your house and removed fiction and personal details. Please stick to OSM good practice, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your changes result in several duplicated highways and other highways dragged out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the no exit tag from the High Street as it would disrupt the traffic flow.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think the building comprises four houses so not a semi-detached house. Thus as it is undivided the correct tag for the feature is building=residential. I've amended it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I noticed you've added a barrier on the oneway Mitchell Street.

Are you sure this is correct? Because it now makes the road a no exit for vehicles. Which on a oneway street is not logical.

Could you amend please? Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This building looks like it's more than one house so the tag would be building=residential. Unless of course you map all the individual dwellings then they are all tagged building=house.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made a few minor tweaks to the outlines. The only big problem was the community_centre being joined to the underground railway. An easy mistake to make, I've unjoined them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Being a residential area this feature looks more like a prank than a bank, thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You made a few duplications of highways here. Don't worry I think I've corrected everything.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I'm very sorry, I made a mistake but there's actually no need to worry. There were 4 nodes and 1 way involved, all in a very small area. It would be very easy to make out the edits done in the changeset, in fact, I've just checked it in a few seconds. So it is extremely easy for anyone in the community to navigate around these contributions. Indeed I have often navigated around large area changesets that folk have inadvertently made, and never really had a problem. Except that is when the changeset has many edits, (sometimes 100 or more), within it. I wonder if you are more concerned with the area rather than the content of the changeset.

Anyone concerned could easily check my work and see that I immediately reverted this changeset just in case I had uploaded changes on two continents.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Same question here.

Hi, Do you know if the recreation ground is for general public use or just for the school? Not your fault but being tagged as just a recreation ground does not indicate who is allowed to use it.

Thaks, Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several instances of highway duplication here, you placed roads on top of existing roads. I've made corrections but wanted to just let you know.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got the Greenway tagged as a 1.5-mile-long bridge. You also have some sections of it duplicating existing highways. It also several times crosses over other highways with no joins.

From the current Bing and Maxar imagery on JOSM, it looks like some sections as set out do not exist, or are way out of alignment. Perhaps the Greenway should have included some of the existing cycleways?

Could you have a look to try and fix the bridge, duplicated sections, and unjoined crossing highways, please? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reinstated the original buildings and then amended them to suit your new mapping. Is something is incorrect it's OSM practice to amend the original or existing mapping, thus all history is kept intact.

Regards Bernard.