Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've not quite got this right. There is already a node tagged proposed:barrier=bollard if this is in the correct place then the tag should be amended to barrier=bollard which be a restriction to the highway. It should also be tagged with the positive access allowed past the bollard foot=yes for example. Your new bollard being only a named node has no meaning in OSM, it's not a highway restriction.

For Raglan Street, if the status remains as a residential highway with no restriction to public access then it's not a permissive road and the two permissive tags should be removed.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the access=no tag as there is still some access and added vehicle=no, which means there is no vehicle access of any type.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tweaked a few tags and areas to suit OSM practice.

Hi, I;ve tweaked a few tags and areas to suit OSM practice.

Hi There, Thanks for having a go.

What you've actually done is to move the crossing point slightly north which is OK as that is now better positioned. But, it's the bollard that is the problem, it needs to be joined onto a highway in order to be a restriction to that highway.

I beg your pardon as I write I see the bollard re-render now joined to the highway. All is OK now.

Happy mapping.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your bollard Node: 9822707952 needs to be joined to a highway in order for it to make restrictions to a highway. At the moment it is not joined so makes no restriction. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be advised that Rockland St Mary FP 3 is now returned to its correct position as per the county definitive map at:- http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This would not be tagged as amenity=place_of_worship, thus I've removed the tags amenity=place_of_worship and religion=no. Please refrain from adding fiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please map single sections of highways independently. Here you've tried to map several highways as one continuous line. This has resulted in several instances of duplicated highways. I'll try to correct the problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This is actually a bridleway and I believe, (even though it isn't designated) that it is Suffolk CC policy to allow cycling on a bridleway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There seems to be something wrong with the new Webpage address you've added.

Hi, You can't see the problem now as I've removed/corrected the offending sections. Actually, I can now see another section of highway you've inadvertently mapped. If you look at the road you refer to in your above link, open that for editing. Zoom in and pan to the next road to the east. At the crossing point of the roads you'll see just to the south an extra node that should not be there. In the previous instance, you had joined a similar node onto the next road making a short duplicate section. Here's a link to the place I'm talking about:- osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=1068814553#map=24/22.92934/71.02735

Regards Bernard

Hi, Please be careful you are duplicating many sections of highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I just wanted to point out that field outlines do not extend to the center lines of highways so should not be joined to the highway line. If they did it would make driving very difficult.

Also footpaths across fields are not joined to field edges/outlines, they are either excluded from the field or are inside one field edge only, definitely not joined to two adjoining field outlines. Again it would make for difficult walking.

The above-mentioned methods of mapping are not to OSM best practice. Also with changesets containing, in this case, 131 objects, it's very difficult to trace your own mistakes. OSM advises uploading much smaller changesets 10 to 20 objects, it costs no more.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Somehow the building outline got duplicated, it might not have been yourself. Anyway, problem is fixed and I've updated the bakery tags.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the duplicates and tidied up as best I can.

Please be careful not to duplicate sections of highways. I've just removed several sections that you've recently mapped.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be careful not to map sections of highway on top of existing highways. This is duplication and it could disrupt routing. I've just corrected several instances of duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I doubt this junction is formally named "Intersection Point". Only formal verifiable names should be added to OSM. The fact that the four roads meet here itself describes it as an intersection point. Thus I've removed the name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That a way may be private, as is almost all land in the UK, is no need to exclude it from OSM. Anything the public can determine can be added to the OSM database.

I've thus reverted your deletion.

Regards Bernard.