Hi, Unfortunately, your edit to fix a dragged node has resulted in or left several other anomalies. dragged nodes, deleted boundaries, and lots of untagged unconnected single nodes.

As well as the problems I mention this changeset also warns you above of 3 crossing_ways:highway-highway, 2 crossing_ways:highway-waterway and 1 disconnected_way:highway.

These problems may not all be yours and could be on several changesets, but could you have a look at this please?

Regards Bernard

Don't be silly. Junction removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your highway, Way: 1 (1042862226), is duplicating the existing highway on which it has been placed, also, the name is unlikely to be a number, thus I've removed it.

I've also squared up the buildings and amended the name to addr:number as a building would have a name or a number. Name and number are two different things, a number is not usually a name.

Please inform your tutor/trainer of these comments so they can have the knowledge to better instruct you.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The grass doesn't extend to the center lines of highways. I've amended a few to show ground truth.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know there were three duplicate sections of path. I've removed the duplicated sections in my Changeset: 118897099

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The only tutorial I can find is here:- https://tinyurl.com/3pcvbteb

I don't think this would be very helpful to you though. The TGC-Designer-Tools seem to be directed mainly to the USA.

I downloaded the tools and tutorial and could not make sense of anything.

Anyway the tools and OSM are not linked, though the tools can draw data from OSM. Our problem here is to maintain the integrity of OSM and not alter/amend it for the sake of another product. The OSM data must be ground truth.

I'm sorry but I can't help with the TGC-Designer-Tools. If you need help with OSM mapping I'd be glad to help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I've removed your new area outline Way: outer boundary defined (1043475948) as it's fiction. The outline of the golf_course named Clacton-on-Sea Golf Club is already mapped as Way: Clacton-on-Sea Golf Club (26834535).

I don't know what you were trying to achieve but please try not to accidentally upload fiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've just remove a lot more duplicated highways that you've added to the database.

Could you please point out this problem to your tutor? Tell the tutor there are problems with duplicated highways that disrupt routing.

It's not your fault! Please ask the tutor for correct instructions and training.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A lot of your new highways are duplicated, replicated, or even quadrupled. Placing highways on top of highways seriously disrupts routing, please don't do this, seek advice.

I've removed all the excess highways.

Regards Bernard.

Highway status amended.

Hi, I've amended the status of these roads, they are definitely not trunk roads.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just letting you know that you placed your new highway Way: 1042897450 on top of existing highways. Making duplicated highways that disrupt routing. I've removed the duplicate.

This problem was warned about in the above tags.

Hi' Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended a few tags to the paths and tracks round here that you've amended. I've also removed several track and service road sections that you inadvertently duplicated.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The golf course outline is already mapped as Way: Flempton Golf Club (94357261). Thus I've removed your inadvertent duplicate outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed your path Way: 1034551073 as it is generally on top of an existing highway. As you agreed this isn't the way to map public transport routes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've changed to bunkers to surface=sand as it's OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've added a lot of duplicated roads, I've removed several of them. Could you please try to not do this again? It seriously disrupts the database and routing.

Regards Bernard,

Fictional names removed

Hi, Thanks for responding, I have actually made a few comments to some of your changesets. These comments are automatically forwarded to you via email, maybe you've not noticed them or they've gone to your spam folder.

This link shows OSM practice of address tagging:- addr=*

The tag addr:housename is "The name of a house."
The tag addr:housenumber is "The house number"
The two tags are for different features of the address and are not interchangeable. You're not supposed to put a name in the number tag nor a number in the name tag. Sheds don't usually have either a name or number.

If a property has a number and a name both can be added to the relevant tag.

I and a couple of other mappers have been so-called "going behind you". Between us, we've looked at almost all of your mapping and corrected hundreds of mistakes. I've also added the access=private tag to the private gardens. By the way that's not messing with stuff we just want OSM to be the best map in the world.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, You've now been told many times that the house numbers only go on the tag addr:housenumber=??
The house number does not go on the tag addr:housename=?? nor on the tag name=58

The residential gardens should be tagged access=private, leisure=garden. Without the private tag, gardens can be looked on as openly accessible to everyone.

Can you please rectify these problems?

Bernard.