Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think some of the changes you made to Whiting's Lane are incorrect.
This is a Norfolk County Council maintained unsurfaced road, reference U33198. Therefore, as far as OSM mapping is concerned, an unclassified highway, even though it may appear to be only a track.

The way is shown on the NCC interactive map of Rights of Way, from this I infer a right of access on foot, hence tagged foot=designated. Other rights or restrictions should be verified with NCC. There may or may not be vehicle (or cycle) rights. I have not verified the fact but I see no reason for vehicle rights not to apply because of the highway classification. I would therefore suggest, (unless you can verify otherwise), that the tag motor_vehicle=no be removed.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The node you added is untagged and in the middle of a featureless body of water. As such it adds nothing to the OSM database and should be removed.

I forgot to say that in great many places you now have a footway going down the middle of a vehicle highway. This duplication also seriously messes up routing.

Hello, I just want to point out that in adding the North Wales Path you have duplicated lots of highways. You've placed a new way on top of a lot of existing ways. A better way would be to segment the existing ways and add them to a relation, naming that relation the North Wales Path. The Wales Coast Path is done, please see here :- relation/1850847#map=10/53.2348/-3.7463

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The positioning of this hotel POI, in the alley behind buildings, some way away fro the address of Romford Road, will not be much help in helping folk to find it. Better to actually draw the building and state the floor if the building has multiple businesses.

You've added a tag "name:en=البيت" this is not an English name and should be removed or correctly tagged perhaps osm.wiki/Tag:name:ar=.

Also "name=البيت" this name is not written in English and should be corrected.

Also hedge way/443736828 is mapped the same. This effectively places a barrier across the whole highway. Better to map each hedge separately. An individual hedge as a linear feature can have a width (and height) tag added thereby not needing an area drawn. For an extremely thick hedge draw a closed way around the perimeter of the individual hedge and tag it with area=yes.

Hello, your hedge "way/443736827" covers the whole of the road Roud Road. Surely this cannot be correct.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I noticed your addition to the OSM database and made a few alterations to better reflect the geography. Your address was on the whole building not just the bar. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are a few things wrong with your addition of this bar to the OSM database. Firstly unless it has recently moved from number 3 to number 12 Balham High Road then you have placed it in the wrong position. Further the name:en tag is not needed (you've already stated the English name in the name= tag), the phone ought to be in an internationally recognized manner (+44 2086 739796). If you need help making amendments please just ask.
Regards Bernard

No response from mapper so the obviously incorrect data has been removed.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There is still a problem here, your addition and subsequent amendments leave a duplicated outline for the building. Both outlines similarly tagged.
With respect I think the eastern third of the building might be a house. The western two thirds may be two houses or two apartments.
Regards

There's no shop, that address is the registered company office for an online wine seller.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just an observation, I notice that Accommodation Way is not connected to Wayside/Woodside. I suspect that the ways do in fact join so it would be best to connect them in the database, thus routing can be computed and folk can render maps accordingly. Regards

Hello, your addition of Hyde Park Place made a duplicated highway. I have therefore removed your duplicate and amended street names.

POI deleted before I saw the above comment.
Note also that the tag name:en=??? is not needed.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The complete details for The Lamb hotel are on the building outline. I have therefore removed your duplicated information.

Hi, OK I understand and agree with that. Mapper LegBritSlav added a way which duplicated part of Julian Road, I removed the duplication but kept the name thinking it might be valid.
The alt:name is now removed and a note added with your information about the terraces.

Hello,
You've also added bicycle parking which is actually bicycle rental.
Also tourism=attraction is not very helpful, if you know there is an attraction there why not detail it?
So it unfortunately looks like all three additions are somewhat fictitious. Please correct the mistakes or remove them.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your addition of a name to a building because the tag name:en=??? is not needed here.
Also that is not the name of that store and in any case what you added was an address "31 green street". Which lacks capitol letters and is in fact situated a long way from here.
If you could explain what you wanted to do perhaps someone can help you.

Hello, you've positioned your company 'Moving In' in a building on Floral Street not on Long Acre.