Hi, you've placed a park inside of a park which doesn't seem correct. Further the two park boundaries are joined at one of the nodes.

A brief look at the paths you've added shows a few anomalies. Several paths are not connected to the roads that they got to. Several paths are on such similar lines that they might be duplication's. Several paths are joined to or go along area outlines. It might be wise to look at them all and rectify inadvertent mistakes.

Hello, I think you have positioned this property on the wrong side of the road (as far as the existing mapping of roads is concerned). It is not therefore verifiable on the ground as mapped.
Further it is very unlikely that the feature is officially name "Home". Also if it is your home is it really a "tourist attraction".
Please rectify your addition to show on the ground verifiable facts.
Is your house and the supposed cosmetics shop one combined feature?
Thanks.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This area looks like it is entirely residential with no shops. Could you please state the name and details of the business? Is it a business operated from a house? Does it have a website to verify it exists?
Features added to the OSM database should be verifiable on the ground, I don't think this meets this criteria.
Regards

Yes Welcome, I've just corrected the postcode for you.

Hello, your opening hours are incorrectly presented. please see :- opening_hours=*

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think if you visit this footpath you will find it is a public right of way. Therefore tagging should reflect this, foot=designated, designation=public_footpath also access=permissive is incorrect and should be removed.

Hello this "line i9n bow" that you have added to the OSM database does not contain enough information to be of any use. Unless you can expand on it, or explain it then it should be removed.

Hello, can you state the purpose of this "blook line"? What is it, what is it for, is it verifiable? You have added it to the OMS live database and I can see no reason for it. Thanks.

HI, I could now only find one long section of duplication near Kinmel Bay, I've deleted it all rather than trying to explain where it is. I think you've removed all the other sections. I noticed the duplication's as I regularly check new mapping for these problems here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.40686&lat=53.09168&zoom=7&overlays=duplicate_ways
You can check for all sorts of problems there by changing the view.

I just noticed, and think you may not be aware that this path is already included in relation: Wales Coast Path (North Wales Coast) (1850847) (please see here :- relation/1850847#map=9/53.2767/-3.4799 )
Regards
Bernard

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your up updating of this way has resulted in a duplication of highways, (one atop another). There seems to be no on the ground restriction to access through this way so I wonder why the access=private tag? Nor any official 20mph restriction that is verifiable on the ground?
Regards Bernard

For your attention please. There is still a lot more duplicated ways where you have placed a new footway on top of existing highways. The whole lot should be removed as it is incorrect, (there are not two ways one atop another), and it corrupts routing software.

Hello, sorry to say I think you've had a mishap with this changeset. Please see way/93715163

It looks like Way: Duddingston Gardens (93715163) has been aligned in a circle. Also dragging part of the railway fence, which shared several nodes, with it (Way: 405090252).

It might be best to revert the whole of this changeset (42883804). Thereby saving everything that existed before the mishap. If you're not familiar with reverting (which is not possible in the iD Editor I could revert it for you, please just ask. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'd just like to point out that your addition to the database (highway named Hudson Way) is not joined to the existing highway network. If you know it is joined to the network then it would be good for you to map it as such. The road immediately north is a service road so would need upgrading to its current status.

There's a beginners guide under the HELP button above and tons of OSM mapping info on the web. I'm just an ordinary mapper but if I can help please just ask.
Regards

No response, duplicate removed.

Hello, I've reverted your addition to the OpenStreetMap database. Reason being that this building is not at Romola Road.

Change-set reverted!
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your first addition to the OSM database went a bit wrong it inadvertently altered existing data and added a road haphazardly through buildings. Therefore I have reverted those alterations for you. I would suggest you read up a bit before your next go at adding/altering the live worldwide database from which many maps are compiled.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your addition to OSM of the sandwich shop, addressed as Washington has appeared in London UK. You've tagged it as a place of worship.

If you can't amend it I'll remove it shortly. Regards

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tidied up your additions and changed the name tag on the garden to a note tag, I don't think that was the proper name for the area. I added landuse=grass to indicate the surface and removed the area tag, (a way, (line) enclosing an area is taken as an area and so doesn't need an area tag.
Regards
Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of the ways you've recently added to OSM are not joined to the roads that they go to, (in this and other change-sets). Also in many instances they cross streams and other boundary's without showing how these barriers are overcome.

May I suggest you read up on the best practices for adding to OSM, before continuing to map, and then amend what you've already added.