Hi, You're making quite a few duplicated sections of footway. I've removed those that I can see on OSMInspector.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You are making lots of duplicated sections of highway. I've corrected several instances. Please be careful not to do this.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure that's not a local name for the wide section of the river?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be sure to join highways where they cross over each other. I've corrected a couple here and removed a duplicate section of your track.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tweaked the footpath Way: 1025283718 to remove a duplicate section that was placed on top of an existing track. (Please correct/amend existing features even if you have to section them up as I have here). I've added formal designation tags to the footpath.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The way that you changed the tag to footway is a service road, you can see vehicles on it in the imagery. I've changed it back to a service road and added foot=yes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wanted to point out that the tag private=permit is not Used by OSM as it isn't logical. I think you are requiring an access tag, please see here:- access=*

If you need help please explain the situation, maybe I can help.

Also, oneway=no is not needed as it is implied by the absence of a oneway tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please refer to my previous comment. Grass areas are surface=grass, the landuse is not to grow a crop of grass. Bunkers are surface=sand, the sand is not usually a natural occurrence. You've now reinstated the incorrect tags that I had removed for you, namely landuse=grass and natural=sand. To now have two descriptive tags for the same feature is doubly wrong.

Hi, It's not too easy to revert with the editor you used so I've reverted it for you using the JOSM editor. All now back as it was.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please say why you deleted the house? Has it been demolished something?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked a few of your feature tags to suit OSM practice, (surface=sand, surface=grass).

Please see:- leisure=golf_course and:- golf=hole for advice/guidance.

Regards Bernard.

Hi sbelemey, Thanks for responding.

I've reverted your change and also gone over the whole of that line marking the sections that seem, I think, to be paths. then removing the sections that are not relevant to any highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, are you sure all addresses on this road are the same postcode and that the whole road is contained within that postcode centroid?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag addr:city=??? should contain the postal city name, as per Royal Mail, not the village name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm sorry to say that your edit inadvertently went a bit awry. Dragging the river line out of place, replacing a gate with a bridge support, and placing another bridge support downstream a bit. Thus I've reverted the situation to as it was.

If you could say what you are trying to achieve maybe I can help or advise.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM likes to be precise as possible. So I've moved your node from being attached to the highway to approximately the position of the premises, (as near as I can tell). I also removed the untagged highway and mapped the service road.

I can't find out the shop address or a current website so can't add any more detail. If you can give more info, address and position I could further improve the OSM data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted all your changes as they are all fiction. You deleted and or moved existing features and added fiction features to aid game playing.

OSM is a live worldwide database, please don't spoil it for yourself and everyone else.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is it OK now, if not please say what's wrong I'll try to help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've recently added several footpaths placing them on top of existing highways. This makes duplication and disruption of routing. When/if a way needs amending/correcting please do it to the existing way, as per OSM best practice. This is to maintain the history of the way and avoid the above-mentioned problems.

I've made the amendments to correct the problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed half of Way: 1023584223 on top of existing highway. This is duplication and disruption of routing. When/if a way needs amending/correcting pleas e do it to the existing way as per OSM best practice to maintain the history of the way.

I've made the amendments to correct the above problems.

Regards Bernard.